> Well to simplify matters, I ported the test to a simple NASM
> program. It displays Supported or Not and returns errorlevel 1 if not found.
> I did a quick check on the PentiumPro under MS-DOS 6.22 + ANSI.SYS, it says
> supported.
> Rebooted the PentiumPro under FreeDOS 1.3 + NANSI.SYS, it s
Hi again,
> On Jul 30, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Jerome Shidel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Jul 30, 2022, at 3:03 PM, TK Chia wrote:
I just created a boot floppy with 1.3’s Kernel, Command, NANSI and the Test
program.
Loaded Command and NANSI to low memory with nothing else in the CONFIG.SYS and
nothin
Hi,
> On Jul 30, 2022, at 3:03 PM, TK Chia wrote:
>
> Hello Jerome,
>
>> The test works correctly under at least the most recent versions of MS-DOS
>> (6.x), PC-DOS and DR-DOS.
>
> Thanks. Well, I could not reproduce whatever failure you were getting
> with your routine under FreeDOS. Witho
Hello Jerome,
The test works correctly under at least the most recent versions of MS-DOS
(6.x), PC-DOS and DR-DOS.
Thanks. Well, I could not reproduce whatever failure you were getting
with your routine under FreeDOS. Without more information, it seems
there is no good way to tell what exac
HI,
> On Jul 30, 2022, at 2:15 AM, TK Chia wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf Quint,
>
>> Well, not having comments to understand what you are doing is pretty
>> tough when you don't have the time to analyze the code line by line. But
>> IIRC, the common way to check for the presence of an ANSI device drive