Hi Mercury,
> Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under
> MS-DOS? Windows has .DLL files, Linux has .KO files, and MS-DOS had...
> what, exactly? In all my years DOSsing I've never heard of anything
> official like this, so I'm pretty sure there was no such thing (unl
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Mercury Thirteen via Freedos-devel wrote:
On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 11:44 AM, Steve Nickolas [email protected] wrote:
...
I've had ideas for what I'd do if I were writing my own OS or my own DOS
clone... but they'd probably be too weird for this list.
...
But I, for
On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 11:44 AM, Steve Nickolas [email protected] wrote:
> ...
> I've had ideas for what I'd do if I were writing my own OS or my own DOS
> clone... but they'd probably be too weird for this list.
> ...
But I, for one, would love to hear those ideas.___
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, DosWorld via Freedos-devel wrote:
Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under MS-DOS?
...
Any constructive feedback would be appreciated! :D
Here is no any standard. I can purpose few way:
Experimental library format in msa2 -
https://github.co
> Was there ever any "official" format for a shared runtime library under
> MS-DOS?
> ...
> Any constructive feedback would be appreciated! :D
>
Here is no any standard. I can purpose few way:
Experimental library format in msa2 -
https://github.com/DosWorld/msa2/tree/master/original/examples/O
First, thanks to all who replied! Good stuff. :)
Also:
On Monday, December 28, 2020 5:02 PM, Danilo Pecher
[email protected] wrote:
> Well, one could also question the point of shared libraries in a system that
> doesn't support multitasking.
> ...
It's not so much a matter of mu
