On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, François Revol wrote:
Nice to see some retro people interested in legal issues :-)
Which reminds me...
The other day I was looking for assistance in cleanrooming some pieces of
MS-DOS 2.11 and 3.x so that I had an option for systems where FreeDOS
might be less than idea
Hi,
Le 07/11/2018 à 16:01, Rugxulo a écrit :
> Hi, Jim,
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 6:50 PM Jim Hall wrote:
>>
>> I have been working to create a list of packages for FreeDOS 1.3.
>>
>> I mentioned back in June (as part of a discussion thread about "Removing
>> non-free packages")
>> that I woul
Hi Jim,
>> (Meh, non-commercial isn't great, but alas, without further
>> clarification, that's probably a no-go for us.)
>
> Yup, requiring that the program *cannot* be sold (non-commercial only)
> is a no-go. But for games, I think it's easy to swap out whatever we
> want, these programs are no
Hi Jim,
>> doslfn ... not sure if it's free/libre, but it's widely used. Of
>> course, there are other alternatives, too, of varying quality (e.g.
>> StarLFN). At least VFAT/LFN is finally unpatented nowadays (I think?).
>> Again, you may have to contact the (inactive) maintainer for
>> clarificat
