Re: [Freedos-devel] Wiki and SF hosted apps

2012-07-09 Thread Jim Hall
Great comments, thanks. I didn't see the ads with my ad blocker in place. Since SourceForge has pushed back the date, we have a bit more time to figure out what to do with the wiki. We always have option 1, but I'd really like to find out from SourceForge how a local MediaWiki could send email out

Re: [Freedos-devel] Wiki and SF hosted apps

2012-07-09 Thread Ulrich Hansen
Hi, I put a lot of work into the network and the virtualbox chapters in the freedos wiki and I like to continue that work. So if you ask me, I would clearly prefer to stay with MediaWiki. I took a quick look on Wikia though and I am not sure that's the right place. There are a lot of ads!

Re: [Freedos-devel] Wiki and SF hosted apps

2012-07-09 Thread Robert Riebisch
Jim Hall wrote: > My recommendation is to move to Wikia (option 2). We can customize the > colors (buttons, links, header, page color) and adjust the background > (color or image) to make a FreeDOS Wiki look "somewhat" like our main > website. I've already set a graphic wordmark as the FreeDOS log

Re: [Freedos-devel] Wiki and SF hosted apps

2012-07-09 Thread Jim Hall
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > Hi all, > > If you have an account with SourceForge, you may have received an > email from them that SourceForge will retire their Hosted Apps on > September 1 this year. You can recognize if something is a Hosted App > by it's URL - if the URL is

[Freedos-devel] Wiki and SF hosted apps

2012-07-09 Thread Jim Hall
Hi all, If you have an account with SourceForge, you may have received an email from them that SourceForge will retire their Hosted Apps on September 1 this year. You can recognize if something is a Hosted App by it's URL - if the URL is of the pattern http://sourceforge.net/apps/appname/projectna