Hi!
13-Мар-2008 18:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (roxana dan) wrote to
[email protected]:
rd> That`s the fact in this case. The UNIX/Linux is not very friendly when it
rd> comes about searching files or try to develop.
This is only your opinion/taste, others may think else.
rd> Li
Hoi Imre,
> You did however make the very valid point that implementing a
> compressed file system is not so easy as one might think.
Luckily the task gets a lot easier if the filesystem will be
readonly (tool to create it, driver to read it). And such a
filesystem is still pretty useful :-).
You did however make the very valid point that implementing a compressed file
system is not so easy as one might think.
There is indeed a problem with random access in a stream. That is not very
trivial to solve. But it shouldn't be overly difficult either.
Imre
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht
No what I mean with this is that if it is a linux driver it means that it is
inherently linked to the internals of linux. I wouldn't think that this would
be very easy to port to anything. At least not unless you would implement the
entire virtual file system layer of linux first.
What I did no
First let me state that I realy shouldn't be writin posts like this.
Altough I think that people online usualy do talk/write like this. Somebody new
to the list may not appreciate it. So for everyone not enjoying the foklore,
sorry.
This makes me think also about what is said about second life
Ah, that looks better. Here is what I have now, mirrored on ibiblio
(where 133b2 is the new release of the1.33b version, and 133b is your
original release of version 1.33b):
$ ls -l blocek133b* source/blocek133b*
-rw-r--r-- 1 freedos users 299315 Mar 20 11:36 blocek133b2.rar
-rw-r--r-- 1 freedo
Hi Imre,
> Does the fact that all this runs on linux slip your mind
> (like in no way interesting for the stated purpose).
Some of the filesystems claim to be implemented in only
4 kilobytes of code. Which is a lot smaller than the FAT
engine in the FreeDOS kernel, for example. If you made
a va
Does the fact that all this runs on linux slip your mind (like in no way
interesting for the stated purpose).
Seriously, how is any of that supposed to be running in DOS? It's mainly not
even embedded (like a set of operating system services you can embed in a
microcontroller application).
Im
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Although there is no more official distribution of OpenWatcom as a
> collection of .zip archives after OpenWatcom 1.3, you can download OW 1.7a
> (1.7.1), and previous releases, as multiple zip files from ibiblio. These
> archives are prepared by Arkady Belousov and
Hi!
http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Alternative_Open_Watcom_distribution
Although there is no more official distribution of OpenWatcom as a
collection of .zip archives after OpenWatcom 1.3, you can download OW 1.7a
(1.7.1), and previous releases, as multiple zip files from ibiblio. These
10 matches
Mail list logo