FreeDOS 1.0 upcoming made it to the slashdot frontpage :-)
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
> OpenWatcom never and not planned to be "closer" to BC, than any other
> compiler. Any case of "close to BC", which you may currently found in OW, is
> result of accident.
At a certain moment, there was a commercial competition that brought
Watcom C colser to B
What do you nean by that? My suggestion has nothing to do with Lin/Win.
I was talking about porting a 16 bit DOS program to a 32 bit DOS program...
Alain
Florian Xaver escreveu:
> Alain M. wrote:
>> I suggest moving to OpenWatcom, it is much closer to BorlandC. I have
>> many programs for both
Evrn thouh it can be a nice thing, I believe that we shoud concentrate
just for a little while in puting out a DOS version. Then we can make
other things run on it...
Alain
Florian Xaver escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> I have another idea (maybe I am not the only person). With HX extender
> many Windows
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Imre Leber wrote:
(I said)
>>
>> I've myself mentioned a couple times (years ago) my plan to take FreeDOS
>> in a new direction but it depends on me being able to use certain tools
>> that do not yet work for me. (i.e., anything using WatTCP/WatT32). If I
>> could get WatT32 w
>-Original Message-
>From: Lyrical Nanoha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2006 08:44 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Why 1.0 (was: Horrible Joke)
>
>On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, HCL BA wrote:
>
>> The version number is not important to me
