Hi!
21-Июл-2004 22:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Koder) wrote to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
K> 1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
K> compiler would be the most interesting?
Probably, OpenWatcom is not only the best, but, probably, only one
modern, working and enou
Koder wrote:
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to be quite powerful as well.
OpenWatcom, of course!! How could I forget! I just passed there a moth ago,
thinking it was a nice thing to open up Watcom C++. But does it also do
16bit exe's? As far as I know, it
> Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
> to be quite powerful as well.
OpenWatcom, of course!! How could I forget! I just passed there a moth ago,
thinking it was a nice thing to open up Watcom C++. But does it also do
16bit exe's? As far as I know, it only uses
Koder wrote:
Hi,
After a few years of being idle in the DOS-scene, I am looking to writing
some new apps. I am using Borland's TC 2.01 because that has been released
for free. Here are some questions for you dev's:
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler
Aitor Santamaría Merino schreef:
A bit offtopic, well, I don't know much about the NT loader, but it
always surprised to me how fragile is the whole installation of a
robust operating system like WinNT can be easily trashed in a few
seconds, by just SYS:-ing whenever it loads from an existing MS
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
still SYS should have some additional possibilities, like WARNING the
user.
I remember my SYS C:..while C: contained Win2000 bootloader..bye bye
Win2000 installation :(
A bit offtopic, well, I don't know much about the NT loader, but it
always surprised to me how fragile i
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to
Hi!
> 1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
> compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
> around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to be quite p
Koder wrote:
Hi,
After a few years of being idle in the DOS-scene, I am looking to writing
some new apps. I am using Borland's TC 2.01 because that has been released
for free. Here are some questions for you dev's:
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler
Hi, Bernd wrote about OSCHECK:
> verry nice! however still not safe to SYS C: if a bootsector is
> analysed but contains a strange name.
> Say, a KERNEL2.SYS.
I thought about "scan for *.SYS / *.COM in boot sector" but then I dropped
the idea because I only wanted to protect the innocen
Hi,
The recent distribution of FreeDOS is very well done and very stable in my
first try-outs. I can still remember the days where I would curse the entire
thing to hell, just a some years ago. It's a very OS now!
But in just some minutes of installing and configuring it, I have come
around some
Hi,
After a few years of being idle in the DOS-scene, I am looking to writing
some new apps. I am using Borland's TC 2.01 because that has been released
for free. Here are some questions for you dev's:
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be t
Eric Auer schreef:
In addition, OSCHECK searches the boot sector for typical kernel file names.
When such a string is found, OSCHECK looks for the corresponding file on disk.
Both on-screen messages and returned errorlevels give you detailled information
about which FORMAT/SYS tool was probably use
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:58:22 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Hi Eric and everyone,
>> "DEVICE=C:\FDOS\BIN\HIMEMORY\EMM386 FRAME=NONE EMM=1024"
>> ... and any /EMM= values below 2354 cause the following error:
>
>Interesting, but then you already know the solution - use an EMM=...
>value above 2354. O
Салям!
8-Июл-2004 19:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BB> MSDOS uses errlvl 1 for unformatted, and errlvl 12 is OK then.
BB> However, I don't know code to implement it:
BB> If errorlevel 16 goto skipwipe // don't format
BB> If "%errorlevel%'=="1" format c: // unfo
Hi!
21-Июл-2004 06:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi, I wrote 2 tools which might be useful for the installer:
EA> http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~eric/stuff/soft/specials/
EA> tiny-file-append-concat.zip
EA> Usage: "concat somefile.xyz" will append the contents of so
16 matches
Mail list logo
