[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Beta9 RC5 has been released

2004-04-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Hello list, This 5th release candidate was intended to be a minor update to the FreeDOS Beta9 series, but has turned out to be a major release, much to my surprise. so far, both the special bootdisk and the packages have been updated, and the installation process has been has slightly tuned and

[Freedos-devel] from ABRAHAMMOSES

2004-04-19 Thread from abrahammoses
from the desk of; MR..ABRAHAM MOSES BILLS AND EXCHANGE ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT MERITH INTL. BANK. VICTORIA ISLAND-LAGOS. REPLY EMAIL TO:([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The Managing Director/CEO. Dear friend, I sincerely write to seek your co-operation and trust to enable my colleagues and I carry out an urg

Re: [Freedos-devel] HIMEM64 test release #2

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Devore
At 05:17 PM 4/19/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Uploaded to are a revised himem64.zip (executable) and >himem64s.zip (source). The files are dated April 19, 2004. Yes, for those several users more alert than I was and who caught the error, the revised files are in directory "downloads", not "uploads"

Re: [Freedos-devel] HIMEM64 test release #2

2004-04-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
/downloads again? Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/uploads are a revised himem64.zip (executable) and --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of Gen

[Freedos-devel] HIMEM64 test release #2

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Devore
Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/uploads are a revised himem64.zip (executable) and himem64s.zip (source). The files are dated April 19, 2004. This fixes a bug which occurs with the A20 methods PS/2, KBC, and Port 92. If your machines use Always On, BIOS, or fast A20 methods, you won't

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: Bart's mem 1.5

2004-04-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 18-Апр-2004 19:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with: >>b7ff81920 DOS system code >>9fff65536 DOS system code EA> Those are video buffers - even if the MCBs

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Апр-2004 15:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> In bug 1759, he also suggests that "No UMBs available" warning (when you EA> use DEVICEHIGH) should be only displayed once - fixed in 2034? On the other side, this once warning may be missed - for example, b

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: Bart's mem 1.5

2004-04-19 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 18-Апр-2004 19:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> Hi, while MS Win98 MEM could be called a "standard", I do not agree with: >>b7ff81920 DOS system code >>9fff65536 DOS system code EA> Those are video buffers - even if the MCBs

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bernd Blaauw
I already have a wishlist which can easily turn into a errata-list, including reproduction tools/batchfiles. my bugs are mainly trivial enhancements (don't mean trivial code changes, btw), so it can wait. I too like Bugzilla to be as empty as possible, but that means me posting patches and I'm not

Re: Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote: > Hi, I could check SOME of the problems, but I assume that you > already KNOW which of them you have addressed and can give a > comment about that question on the list first. Don't assume. Any comments will end up in Bugzilla itself. If there aren't any it m

Re: [Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote: > Hi, as FreeDOS 2034 is out, does it make attempts to fix > http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1745 ? > "renaming dir with trailing backslash makes it vanish" which could be > blamed on shell, kernel or both? [...] Eric, anyone can look th

[Freedos-devel] Recent Bugzilla entries

2004-04-19 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, as FreeDOS 2034 is out, does it make attempts to fix http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1745 ? "renaming dir with trailing backslash makes it vanish" which could be blamed on shell, kernel or both? How about Netware related bug 1753, as reported by Erwin, does 2034 fix it?

Re: [Freedos-devel] [announce] mem 1.6

2004-04-19 Thread Jim Hall
Bart Oldeman wrote: Thanks for the feedback: MEM 1.6 is now available: http://freedos.sourceforge.net/mem/mem16.zip Changes: * minor output tweaks, don't upcase names anymore * try to detect UMB holes and don't count them as upper memory * display UMB holes as "reserved" in mem/f outp

[Freedos-devel] Notification d'état de la distribution

2004-04-19 Thread Service de distribution du courrier
- Ces destinataires ont été traités par le serveur de messagerie : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Échec; 5.2.2 (boîte aux lettres saturée) Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.libertysurf.net Received-from-MTA: dns; chez.com (80.15.28.119) Arrival-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:33:40 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL P