Салям!
31-Янв-2004 18:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick J. LoPresti) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PJL> Issue 2 (interrupts) is a potential problem for the original approach,
PJL> because cmpsd is interruptible. So if A20 is disabled and the bytes
PJL> in low memory change during an interrupt, the com
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
31-Янв-2004 07:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+++ config.c 31 Jan 2004 15:06:36 - 1.64
+ if (pLine[0]>='0' && pLine[0]<='9')
{
int nIndex = pLine[0]-'0';
Is there some reason why isdigit() can't be called? -- Gregory Pietsch
int nIndex = (UBYTE)(
I want to open this to a wider audience, especially experts on the x86
in all of its flavors.
The question is, how do you reliably test the current state of the A20
gate? Put more generally, how can you detect when two different
addresses actually refer to the same memory location?
The original
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Imre Leber wrote:
> When testing defrag in DOSemu, it seems that i am constantly getting a
> middle mouse button press, (from the int33h handler) even if i don't press
> on the mouse. That is why the menu is so shaky (I don't get the same
> behavior in MSDOS). Does anybody hav
Hi All,
I fail to display color in CONFIG.SYS even I copy the example from
document.
eecho $[##;##m
Rgds,
Johnson.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the br
Hi!
31-Янв-2004 14:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi, still looking for a way to make FORMAT able to format 720k
EA> disks in 1440k drives...
I think, you may/should turn off this feature until you receive
explicit requrest for this format and/or you get te
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:05:13 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>I smell an EMM38664 problem here, but to be sure, can you try HIMEM64+UMBPCI? I'm
>using this combination (+HIRAM) here on my GA-6VEML/VIA PLE133T without problems, but
>haven't tried EMM38664.
HIMEM64C+UMBPCI have no problem.
Rgdsm,
Hi All,
Sorry I missed (again) ... the crash screen:
-
Illegal Instruction Occurred
CS=C828 IP= SS=9995 SP=61FE DS= ES=C828
EAX=6A2D EBX=6216 ECX=0001 EPX=51F6
ESI= EDI=0008 EBP=620A
Opcodes @CS:IP 00 6F 6E 64 61 72 79 2D
Aborting program
EMM386 - Unabl
I'd try unloading EMM386[64] altogether and see if you still have crashes. It's the
most likely compatibility culprit at first, particularly since you said the HIMEM64
original also crashed so the new changes aren't at fault.
At 02:29 AM 2/1/2004 +0800, you wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I've tried to r
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:29:17 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
I've tried to replace HIMEM64C/EMM38664 instead of FDXXMS/UMBPCI and
during test I crash the PC with following configuration:
[...]
I wonder where the problem is, when running FDXXMS/UMBPCI all program
can loadhigh.
I smell an EMM38664 problem
Hi!
31-Янв-2004 07:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> +++ config.c 31 Jan 2004 15:06:36 - 1.64
> + if (pLine[0]>='0' && pLine[0]<='9')
>{
> int nIndex = pLine[0]-'0';
int nIndex = (UBYTE)((UBYTE) pLine [0] - '0');
if (nIndex <= 9) {
or:
unsigned char ch = pLine [0] - '0';
if (
Hi Johnson,
My focus is gradually switching back to PG and have
your suggestion in mind, I hope:
1. PG file.1 file.2 ... file.n is what you want;
2. not required if the above feature works;
3. this will be fixed in next version;
Thanks!
BAHCL
--- Johnson Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：>
> 1)
Hi BAHCL,
Back to more test, and suggestion:
1) I cannot put 2 or more argument on the command line
2) The sequence of the file is fixed, when I want to compare the
content of the 1st and last file I can't bypass the other files
3) When pressing F10 in last file will quit the program, too many wa
Hello All,
I've tried to replace HIMEM64C/EMM38664 instead of FDXXMS/UMBPCI and
during test I crash the PC with following configuration:
-CONFIG.SYS-
!version=6.22
!break=on
!dos=high,umb
!dosdata=high
!files=50
!buffers=10,0
!lastdrive=z
device=c:\freedos\himem64c.exe (himem64.exe crash
The newest freedos kernel is up at sourceforge now, at the usual places --
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5109
you can construct the urls from previous announcements.
The emphasis for this release was on fixing bugs.
short list of changes:
bugs fixed:
- 1712 findfirst retur
The newest freedos kernel is up at sourceforge now, at the usual places --
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5109
you can construct the urls from previous announcements.
The emphasis for this release was on fixing bugs.
short list of changes:
bugs fixed:
- 1712 findfirst retur
This is to announce two things:
UDMA 6.8 is out. Besides the ubiquitous optimisations, the main news in it is that especially for some badly written BIOS's pretending to meet but *not* meeting the EDD standard, a special hardware-only scan mode has been added. If anyone can test it on the latest I
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:02:10 +0100 (MET), Eric Auer wrote:
- FreeDOS FORMAT: int 13.5 works, int 13.2 (read) fails.
- Con>Fmt 1.07: "drive not ready" if you attempt to format to 720k
- FdFrm18 (FdFrm/88 1.8): not much better
DD (720 KB) disks have no second hole. Use adhesive tape to simulate that
Hi, still looking for a way to make FORMAT able to format 720k
disks in 1440k drives...
- FreeDOS FORMAT: int 13.5 works, int 13.2 (read) fails.
- Con>Fmt 1.07: "drive not ready" if you attempt to format to 720k
- FdFrm18 (FdFrm/88 1.8): not much better
...
So what is this all about? Maybe a gen
Hi all, Ian Trider seems to have solved the mystery of "ASUS ships a
broken FreeDOS installer with certain motherboards but they do not
know that they ship any FreeDOS at all":
http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/crashfreebios2.htm
If the BIOS detects a checksum error, it switches to CD-ROM boot and
20 matches
Mail list logo
