Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-22 Thread Chris Rees
On 19 June 2011 10:14, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:50, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote: Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, in the same

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-19 Thread Chris Rees
On 19 June 2011 15:36, Dieter BSD wrote: >> CONFDIR is for base, not ports > > Perhaps ${BASE_CONF_DIR}, ${PORTS_CONF_DIR}, ... Have a look at the surrounding code, it matches the other variables that we have always used. Please don't let this become a bikeshed! Chris __

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-19 Thread Dieter BSD
> CONFDIR is for base, not ports Perhaps ${BASE_CONF_DIR}, ${PORTS_CONF_DIR}, ... ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-19 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:50, Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: >> >> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote: >>> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, >>> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN, >

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-19 Thread Chris Rees
On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote: >> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, >> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN, >> CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR. >> >> P

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-19 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi Chris, On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote: > Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, > in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN, > CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR. > > Please would someone review and give an opinion on [1]? Shoul

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-17 Thread Chris Rees
On 17 Jun 2011 19:53, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > I like it. I think we should get it in ASAP. > > Warner You have a src bit ;) Chris ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, s

Re: CONF class of files

2011-06-17 Thread Warner Losh
I like it. I think we should get it in ASAP. Warner On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, > in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN, > CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR. > > P

CONF class of files

2011-06-17 Thread Chris Rees
Hi all, Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files, in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN, CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR. Please would someone review and give an opinion on [1]? I'd _really_ appreciate getting it in before 9-R Chris http: