> The fourth ALPHA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
> on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
> sparc64 architectures.
>
> Note: Due to build issues within the head/ branch, ALPHA3 ISO builds
> were skipped.
>
> The 10.0-ALPHA4 builds correlat
Hi all,
I've got a panic on my 10.0 FreeBSD.
This system was building port with poudriere and generate special
nanobsd images (with unionfs usage) when it panic.
I didn't have enough swap space for a full dump, I've just have a text dump:
root@orange:/var/crash # cat info.last
Dump header from dev
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
> use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be
> sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended).
>
Perhaps, a no
On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>>
Hello,
I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
CURRENT.
PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Development
started as Google Summer of Code project in 2009. It has been in ports
since Sept 2011. I maintain the project.
Conceptually PEFS is similar t
On 07.10.2013 19:09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300
On 10/07/13 12:31, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
> CURRENT.
>
> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Development
> started as Google Summer of Code project in 2009. It has been in ports
> since Sept 2011.
Hi all,
On our production system on r255173 we have problem with abnormal high system
load caused (not sure) with L2ARC placed on a few SSD, 490 GB total size.
After a fresh boot everything seems to be fine, Load Average less then 5.00.
But after some time (nearly day-two) Load Average jump to 1
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 13:09, Dmitriy Makarov wrote:
>
> How can L2 ARC Size: (Adaptive) be 1.44 TiB (up) with total physical size
> of L2ARC devices 490GB?
>
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=251478
L2ARC compression perhaps?
___
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 14:39 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> These caught my eye today, and the checks strewn about
> sys/dev/drm2/radeon seem completely bogus to me, but I don't have the
> h/w to test it at the moment.
>
> /usr/src/sys/modules/drm2/radeonkms/../../../dev/drm2/radeon/rs690.c:491:37:
>
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
>> use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be
>> sure to check out th
Data on pool have compressratio around 1.4
On diferent servers with same data type and load L2 ARC Size: (Adaptive) can be
diferent
for example 1.04TiB vs 1.45TiB
But it's all have same porblem - grow in time.
More stange for us -
ARC: 80G Total, 4412M MFU, 5040M MRU, 76M Anon,
Hello.
I would like to present a patch for ns8250 serial that I would like to
commit in the near future (if there are no objections).
The patch is fixing newest DesignWare UART with busy detection.
During frequency divisors configuration when UART is busy transferring or
receiving data, line cont
Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to
implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k
sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to commit
this in time for 10.0-BETA1 so it needs some testing to work out any
obvious bugs bef
Hi Gleb & All
Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
> CURRENT.
>
> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Development
> started as Google Summer of Code project in 2009. It has been in ports
> since Sept 2011. I mai
Resending to current
This is a regression between alpha2 and alpha4. I first setup a disk to
boot 10 just after alpha2 was tagged. A few days ago I updated to
alpha4 and started getting timeout messages, I have just built alpha5
r256098 and still get them.
I just had 10 running for a few hours a
The fifth ALPHA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The 10.0-ALPHA5 builds correlate to svn revision r256092 of the head/
branch.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
Hi,
You should add:
* a loop counter, to break out after a while;
* a DELAY(1) or something.
-adrian
On 7 October 2013 12:54, Zbigniew Bodek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to present a patch for ns8250 serial that I would like to
> commit in the near future (if there are no objections).
Rebuilding sysutils/hal should fix this problem. It's been reported several
times in the past week or two, and rebuilding this port fixed it for me
when I ran into it.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> Resending to current
>
> This is a regression between alpha2 and alpha4.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Nikolai Lifanov
wrote:
> On 10/07/13 12:31, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
>> CURRENT.
>>
>> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Development
>> started as Google Summer of
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi Gleb & All
> Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
>> CURRENT.
>>
>> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Development
>> started as Google Summer of
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 13:15 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You should add:
>
> *[snip]
> * a DELAY(1) or something.
>
Why? Why oh why do people write
while (!read_some_status_register())
DELAY(n);
when DELAY() is implemented as, roughly:
while (read_some_counter_register() <
In somewhat of a followup to the 10.0-ALPHA5 announcement...
Preinstalled virtual machine images for 10.0-ALPHA5 are now available
for amd64 and i386 architectures.
The images are located under the 'snapshots' directory on FTP, here:
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAGES/Lat
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote:
As usual with such upgrades, pkg_libchk is your friend. Assuming you have
updated pixman:
portmaster graphics/libGL graphics/dri
pkg_libchk -o | grep pixman | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq > pixman-files.txt
portmaster =D `cat pixman-files.txt`
portmaster -aD
I've just have another crash related to mount_unionfs but on sparc64
arch this time ( 10.0-ALPHA4 #2 r255947).
Still no core dump:
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: 1c05f2000
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
panic() at panic+0x1d4
vm_fault_hold() at vm_fault_hold+0x174
vm_fault() at
I'd love to see a linux style way of saying "I'd like to sleep from roughly
this time interval to this time interval; feel free to do what you need."
Then yes, it could be implemented as a sleep wakeup from a timer, or as a
call to a hypervisor to do the same, or .. or...
-adrian
On 7 October
Hello Adrian,
Thank you for your remarks.
Please check my answers in-line.
Best regards
Zbigniew Bodek
2013/10/7 Adrian Chadd
> Hi,
>
> You should add:
>
> * a loop counter, to break out after a while;
>
[ZBB] In general as long as UART is busy we cannot proceed but if the
timeout occurs we c
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt to no
Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/162175 .
___
freebsd-c
cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc
-I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq
-fno-common -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-
On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>
>> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
>> 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt
>> to no
>
> Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/162175 .
> __
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:36 +0200, Zbigniew Bodek wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> Thank you for your remarks.
> Please check my answers in-line.
>
> Best regards
> Zbigniew Bodek
>
>
> 2013/10/7 Adrian Chadd
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You should add:
> >
> > * a loop counter, to break out after a while;
>
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc
> -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe
> -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/a
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
> >
> >> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
> >> 1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt
> >> to no
> >
> > Ple
I know I am a certified crank, but ... why? This is some of the simplest code
on the planet. Is it broken by recent OS releases? I use ci/co every single
day to track changes to individual config files on individual machines. For
simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf, a simple 'c
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 14:56 -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:36 +0200, Zbigniew Bodek wrote:
> > Hello Adrian,
> >
> > Thank you for your remarks.
> > Please check my answers in-line.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Zbigniew Bodek
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/7 Adrian Chadd
> >
> > > Hi,
>
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
> -nostdinc
> > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../dev/cxgbe
> > -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
> >
On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files on
> individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf,
> a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a trivial way to maintain local revision control.
And sorry
One more question -
we have two counter -
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_size: 1256609410560
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.l2_asize: 1149007667712
can anybody explain how to understand them i.e. l2_asize - real used space on
l2arc an l2_size - uncompressed size,
or maybe something else ?
Vitalij
On 7 October 2013 22:08, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files
> on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf,
> sysctl.conf, a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a tri
On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely
> helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts
> I've cooked up use ci(1) to keep a record of changes made during the
> (possibly custo
Hello Ian.
Well you can't really perform wake event basing on busy interrupt because
we are busy waiting/sleeping i.a. to avoid that interrupt to occur. I tried
to use pause() that should switch to another task for the declared amount
of time and I got:
"panic: mi_switch: switch in a critical sect
On 10/7/13 2:14 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely
helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts
I've cooked up use ci(1) to keep a record of ch
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
>
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
a kernel and a few bits that are barel
Hello, Igor.
You wrote 8 октября 2013 г., 1:26:07:
>> Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
IM> So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
IM> decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
IM> a kernel and a few bits tha
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>
> > Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
> >
>
> So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
> decide to move away from distrib
Details on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=dNzL3yXR
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>>>
Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
1. Change the default to the 'non-standard k
On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
svnlite? :)
>
Thanks Lev & Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a
lot of stuff on this end...
Cheers,
--
Igor M.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsd
On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> "Install from ports" is a non-starter. Our development systems will never be
> connected to the internet for a ports upgrade. In this environment, in-base
> RCS is a very useful tool.
Why is install from packages any harder than installing t
.. don't be surprised how many people do exactly this; then compile what
handful of things they need from source in order to make a server.
-adrian
On 7 October 2013 14:53, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > "Install from ports" is a non-starter.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
> use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be
> sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended).
>
>
rc.subr use rcs in bac
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> svnlite? :)
> >
>
> Thanks Lev & Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a
> lot of stuff on this end...
>
Why does that screw up anything? Just include the RCS pack
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>
> > On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
> use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be
> sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended).
Thanks for removing this piece
On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin
> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>
> > On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2013-10-07
On Oct 7, 2013, at 23:04, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:52 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>> cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
>> -nostdinc
>>> -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbe/../../../de
On 2013-10-07 18:25, Teske, Devin wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Teske, Devin
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-10-07 17:00, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, A
TB --- 2013-10-07 18:40:22 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-10-07 18:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
> Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems,
> without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs.
We are physically air-gapped from the internet, none
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your
> > systems, without any of your own code or any customisation?
>
> We install from the base release
Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi Gleb & All
> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to ask everybody's opinion regarding committing PEFS to
> >> CURRENT.
> >>
> >> PEFS is a stacked cryptographic file system for FreeBSD. Devel
On 2013-10-07, at 3:45 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Having RCS in the base system is very useful. We use it to track changes to
> bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale customizations.
> (Those ones get git, but they also get an install of /usr/ports with a fully
> popula
Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700:
> Patch is available here:
> https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07cb75feba3467e4d4c043c.patch
Is there a reason you are writing your own AES-NI implementation instead
of using the OpenCrypto framework?
I
Hi!
Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.
If everyone who communicates says "x" and no-one says anything about the
other letters "a"->"w", "y", "z", then we as developers don't really have a
good cross-section of what peopl
On 2013-10-07, at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
> earlier in the development process.
So when was this first discussed? I've been on -current for over a decade. If
I missed a prior discussion I truly apologize.
--
On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.
Adiran this is the first I've heard of removing RCS.
I would have screamed about it had I heard anything..
so now that I officially regi
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700:
>> Patch is available here:
>> https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07cb75feba3467e4d4c043c.patch
>
> Is there a reason you are writing your own AES
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
-a
On 7 October 2013 16:46, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback lik
On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed.
Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's users
will never use your preferred communication media. So when you propose to
remove a feature, absence of pu
On 7 October 2013 16:58, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed.
>
> Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's
> users will never use your preferred communication me
On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be
sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen
On 10/8/13 6:45 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems,
without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs.
We are phy
On 8 October 2013 01:00, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[snip]
Oh, I know it's an up-hill battle. But I honestly thought that this had
> been communicated on a list somewhere. It seems.. not. I don't know why.
> Gah.
It's been communicated at Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:43:21 -0400, but that doesn't
meed there's
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyboard mapping' prompt
to no
Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer
On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>>>
Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
1. Change the default to the 'non-standard keyb
Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700:
> >> Patch is available here:
> >> https://github.com/glk/freebsd-head/commit/b4d2c4a5f42f88fdd07c
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800:
> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc
> becasue it is "just there"
+1
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All
On 2013-10-07 20:21, Teske, Devin wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
> Additional, it includes some other changes to bsdinstall:
>
Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 17:29 -0400:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> > On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
> > >
> >
> > So there's no version c
On 10/8/13 5:29 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide t
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700:
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:31 -0700:
>> >> Patch is available here:
>> >>
On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800:
not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc
becasue it is "just there"
+1
Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least
Amazemen
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
> > > decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
> > > a kernel and a few bits that are barely sufficient for the initial
On 2013-10-07, at 5:40 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> svnlite?
>>
> fail
I won't go that far, immediately.
But I need a tool that lets me migrate the history of my RCS files to the new
regime.
And the new tools(s) *must* be part of the base system. (Migration tools
included.)
And the new
Finally got around to it, kern/182818. Thanks for the encouragement.
On 10/12/12 11:14, Adam McDougall wrote:
I did not, but I put it on my list to try to accomplish.
On 10/11/12 13:41, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Did you ever file a PR for the slow SATA behaviour?
Adrian
On 11 October 2012 09:52
Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 20:42 -0400:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > > So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
> > > > decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just
> > > > d
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
> it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
>
>
> -a
It was mentioned briefly on stable@
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/0692
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your
> > > systems, without any of your own code or any customisation?
> > We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs.
> >
> > We are physically air-gapped from the inte
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > No, not really.
> >
> > # mkdir local
> > # svnadmin create ./local
> > # svn import /etc file:///$PWD/local
>
> besides the s/svn/svnlite/ you forgot... It doesn't work... Sure it
WITH_SVN in src.conf will insta
On 8 October 2013 01:58, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
> > it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
> >
> >
> > -a
>
> It was mentioned briefly on stable@
>
> http:
On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2013-10-07 20:21, Teske, Devin wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>>>
On 2013-10-07 16:43, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Allan Jude wrote:
>
>> Ad
On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
[snip]
> > Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that
> > a path might be a file: url relative to the current working directory...
>
> I don't know what
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
> involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it
> showed up in some of the messages there.
I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:03:44AM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
>
> > > Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that
> > > a path mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/13 17:42, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When
did FreeBSD decide to move away from distributing a usable
OS? Why n
On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it
showed up in some of the messages there.
I don't see any dis
Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 17:41 -0700:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 16:47 -0700:
> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >> > Gleb Kurtsou wrote this messa
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01:34AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to
> >> use RCS please install eith
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>
>> I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
>>> involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memor
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
