Hi, everybody,
My lab wants to buy some G-NICs. I suggest to buy those NIC supported
VI/IP. But I do not know which G-NIC(VI/IP) drivers supported in FreeBSD5.0
?
http://www.emulex.com/products/viip/index.html
But this NIC is only support Solaris.
Does FreeBSD have some projects about that?
Marc Butler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:11:16PM +0100, Michael Class wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am facing a problem that my Kodak DC4800 Camera is not recognized by a
>current FreeBSD-current system (I do not have release systems around, so
>I can not test aginst them, but I suspect that it would
There's a post to -smp I made about this today:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=4779+0+current/freebsd-smp
It details the problem and some possible solutions.
* Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030102 16:10] wrote:
> Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> >The first is new to me (I've lagged behi
I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be
more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or
alternatively rename the structure to "pc98_partition" or similar.
I would advocate the latter.
Poul-Henning
===> usr.bin/kdump
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/bang
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:43:34PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Quoting Christian Brueffer :
> >
> >
> > |
> > | Hi,
> > |
> > | I'm seeing the same on two boxen here. The errors seem to have been
> > | introduced during the latest pcm locking changes in mid-december.
Christian Brueffer wrote:
Well, it's not only maestro hardware:
pcm0: port 0x18c0-0x18ff,0x1c00-0x1cff irq 11 at
device 3
1.5 on pci0
The same with a CMI8738.
I don't have any boards with these chips, but if it helps, I can give
you full root access on one of the machines.
- Christian
M
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hi,
Debugging trivial C++ programs in GDB is knackered, complaining about "ABI
doesn't define required function XXX" when doing operations such as printing
classes and structures which inherit from others, and setting breakpoints in
virtual functions, etc.
Adding "gnu-v2-abi.c" and "gnu-v3-abi.c"
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:22:28AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Christian Brueffer wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Well, it's not only maestro hardware:
> >
> >pcm0: port 0x18c0-0x18ff,0x1c00-0x1cff irq 11 at
> >device 3
> >1.5 on pci0
> >
> >The same with a CMI8738.
> >
> >I don't have any boards with these c
Starting around the end of the year, sshd is taking a LONG time to
proceed, just a bit after the few first packets.
Here:
11:25:03.624519 172.31.199.17.2058 > 172.31.199.20.22: S [tcp sum ok]
2790790408:2790790408(0) win 57344 (DF) (ttl 64, id 17561, len 60)
11:25:03.624771 172.31.199.20.22 >
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Starting around the end of the year, sshd is taking a LONG time to
proceed, just a bit after the few first packets.
Ok, I found the query packets, on the loopback:
[root@piratinga root]# tcpdump -ni lo0 -s1500
tcpdump: listening on lo0
11:54:05.602126 127.0.0.1.49202 >
I've experienced -current lock up in exactly the same way twice now;
once with 5.0-RC2, and just now, with sources from 30th December.
The system in question is a Sharp PC-AR50 laptop. In both instances
the system was idle and I was editing a file in vim on ttyv0. Both
I'm running -CURRENT from around Dec 28th, 2002, 04:00 -0600, on a
testing machine. While debugging a 3rd party module, I occasionally
find myself in situations where I can't obtain a core dump. (e.g., a
panic related to a lock assertion occurs just before the dump routine
beg
I've seen similar erratic behaviour myself when using gdb without -k
command switch. Can it be your problem too?
Also, you might want to look for sample .gdbinit files for useful gbd
macros other people are using. These files are in the tree somewhere.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send m
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:19:03AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> I've seen similar erratic behaviour myself when using gdb without -k
> command switch. Can it be your problem too?
Are you saying that you don't see this problem when using the -k flag?
I don't have the -k option at my di
dcs> Ok, I found the query packets, on the loopback:
dcs> [root@piratinga root]# tcpdump -ni lo0 -s1500
dcs> tcpdump: listening on lo0
dcs> 11:54:05.602126 127.0.0.1.49202 > 127.0.0.1.53: 41012+ PTR?
dcs> 17.199.31.172.in-addr.arpa. (44)
dcs> 11:54:10.605353 127.0.0.1.49203 > 127.0.0.1.53: 4101
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be
> more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or
> alternatively rename the structure to "pc98_partition" or similar.
I think that the
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
dcs> Ok, I found the query packets, on the loopback:
dcs> [root@piratinga root]# tcpdump -ni lo0 -s1500
dcs> tcpdump: listening on lo0
dcs> 11:54:05.602126 127.0.0.1.49202 > 127.0.0.1.53: 41012+ PTR?
dcs> 17.199.31.172.in-addr.arpa. (44)
dcs> 11:54:10.605353 127.0.0.
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:21:56 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > After DP2 was released, PCCARDs were no longer recognized by IBM
> > ThinkPads in the 600 series. I just get:
> >
> > pccard1: Card has no functions!
> > cbb1
ryan beasley wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:57:53AM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
>
>>Starting around the end of the year, sshd is taking a LONG time to
>>proceed, just a bit after the few first packets.
>
>Ok, I found the query packets, on the loopback:
>17.199.31
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be
>> more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or
>> alternatively ren
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro
> writes:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be
> >> more some similar code in
% Index: vm_swap.c
% ===
% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/vm/vm_swap.c,v
% retrieving revision 1.127
% retrieving revision 1.128
% diff -u -1 -r1.127 -r1.128
% --- vm_swap.c 3 Jan 2003 09:55:05 - 1.127
% +++ vm_swap.c 3 Jan 200
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, ryan beasley wrote:
> The serial port on the -CURRENT machine is compiled at 38400. FYI,
> jesper == 4.7R-p2 debugging box, and fredrik == 5.0 panic box. This
> instance of gdb was compiled from source w/ the patches found in the
> devel/gdb52 port. (I don't h
According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav:
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 03:42:27 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: alpha tinderbox failure
>
It is still generating multi-thousands mails, please fix des.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Se
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Trent Nelson wrote:
> I've experienced -current lock up in exactly the same way twice now;
> once with 5.0-RC2, and just now, with sources from 30th December.
>
> The system in question is a Sharp PC-AR50 laptop. In both instances
> the system was idle and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>% Index: vm_swap.c
>% ===
>% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/vm/vm_swap.c,v
>% retrieving revision 1.127
>% retrieving revision 1.128
>% diff -u -1 -r1.127 -r1.128
>% --- vm_swap.c
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, ryan beasley wrote:
> > The serial port on the -CURRENT machine is compiled at 38400. FYI,
> > jesper == 4.7R-p2 debugging box, and fredrik == 5.0 panic box. This
> > instance of gdb was compiled from source w/ the patches
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Bruce Evans wrote:
> "pc98_partition" is OK, but "mbr_partition" is bogus since partition tables
> are not restricted to the MBR -- there is one in every extended partition.
>
> is similarly OK and is similarly bogus.
>
> "at386" would be a better prefix/suffix than "mbr" for the non-pc98 pc's.
Am Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2003 10:44 schrieb Tim Robbins:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:51:20PM +0100, Michael Ranner wrote:
> > After mounting the portalfs,
> >
> > # cat /p/tcp
> >
> > portalfs hangs instead of expected "cat: /p/telnet: No such file or
> > directory"
Ok, I have to correct this. Th
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm actually more than a bit of mind to rip out the entire bogus
> swap-stripe code: If you want swap on a striped disk, you should
> use hardware, controller, vinum, ccd or raidframe to stripe.
Ccd is a nice simple solution, but by using it you
< said:
> I just installed RC2 using a 3C574B with the 'ep' driver; worked just fine
> aside from needing to re-roll kern.flp and mfsroot.flp to support OLDCARD.
My 3C589D works just fine in 5-current with NEWCARD.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
We have some software we'd like to behave slightly differently if it is
in a jail.
What methods do people use to detect they are in a jail?
procfs/curproc might work but I don't want to depend on procfs.
ps aux can be used but seems rather heavyweight.
Something like a sysctl would be best. I cou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>We have some software we'd like to behave slightly differently if it is
>in a jail.
>
>What methods do people use to detect they are in a jail?
>procfs/curproc might work but I don't want to depend on procfs.
>ps aux can be used but seems
Hello...
tl0: device timeout
lock order reversal
1st 0xc0331020 ifnet (ifnet) @ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:1181
2nd 0xc2576ab8 tl0 (network driver) @ /usr/src/sys/pci/if_tl.c:2067
Driver is loaded via kld module from /boot/loader.conf.
To get interface up I need to unload and load module again.
Her
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> >
> >We have some software we'd like to behave slightly differently if it is
> >in a jail.
> >
> >What methods do people use to detect they are in a jail?
> >procfs/curproc might work but I
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I was looking into some "could sleep messages" and found some bogus
locking in the attach routine of many drivers. Several init a mtx in
their softc and then lock/unlock it in their attach routine. This, of
course, does nothing to provide exclusive access to a device. I assume
there is going to
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Which seems a problem sticking up it's head once so often.
I had it happen to me now 3 times over the last day. It just drops into the debugger.
And I've foun little extra info in the archive.
What dows this actually mean? Is something leaking in the kernel.
IF so how do I help it go away.
Hi,
I've seen similar posts about this problem but with no
solution here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=212876+0+archive/2002/freebsd-current/20021222.freebsd-current
I've recently cvsup'd and rebuilt the world, and now I cannot
access my machine with ssh. In the console, I am s
> Good year everybody
>
> Luigi, I converted your patch to CURRENT, there were only
> minor changes to do and it seems to work !
>
> sis0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem
> 0xec005000-0xec005fff irq 1$
> at device 4.0 on pci0
> sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:e2:94:66:99
> miibus0: on sis0
> ukphy0: on
From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We have some software we'd like to behave slightly differently if it is
> in a jail.
>
> What methods do people use to detect they are in a jail?
There's a program called in.jail (/usr/ports/sysutils/jailer) that is
capable of detecting if it is runnin
(cc'd to -questions, where I first post my problem, with no luck)
Valentin Nechayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fix it with:
> define(`confDIRECT_SUBMISSION_MODIFIERS',`CC u')dnl
> For now I has no such problem at my home machine.
> Yes, this solution isn't intuitive.
Thanks. I tried that a
"Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> Thanks. I tried that and some other things (eg service.switch). Even
> read the book and help files some more. Terry's suggestion regarding
> "expensive" seemed like the opposite of what I needed (I was trying to
> keep the msg out of the queues) and I had no luck t
Hi all,
I just subscribed to the mailing lists today after upgrading to
5.0RC2, so I'm not sure if this has been reported or not. I'm relatively
new to FreeBSD (although I'm a long time Linux user), so I'll report how
I installed, just in case I missed something that might be causing this
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The book is pretty useless. The reason the fix you are using
> works is because you have an IPv6 connection by default, and by
> explicitly specifying an IPv4 address, IPv4 is used.
>
> The issue here is the .in-addr.arpa. delegation for localhost
> is
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>> Use sysctl to pick up your own proc, look for the jail flag. It takes
>> less than 10 lines of C.
>
>I can't see anything relevant in sysctl -a.
We don't return binary blobs from sysctl -a.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zil
53 matches
Mail list logo
