The point is that the wording is not acceptable on the mailing list, no
matter whether you are offended or not.
That you're not is a good thing though :-)
Nick
>
> On 13-Sep-99 Mark S. Reichman wrote:
> > I would say an apology is due... This is somewhat lame..
>
> Nah, he's right I
On 12 Sep, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> What's the verdict on newpcm and Vibra16X? Has anyone had any luck in
> finding out why it doesn't work, or how to make it work? Mine won't
> make any sound at all (except for the usual noise) no matter what I do
> - play mp3s, cat my kernel into /dev/audio0
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 10:56:42AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> Just to avoid duplicated effort: I currently have work in progress
> on a "fslog" pseudo-device. It enables you to monitor a filesystem
> and receive notifications for all interesting changes to files and
> directories. This includ
> >More complete patches ahve already been applied to -current:
> >
> >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/prof_machdep.c,v
> >Working file: prof_machdep.c
> >head: 1.14
>
> I checked, I do have rev 1.14 in place and it borks.
>
> How far off is the chance of -p going haywire with some kernel
> >You'll also note that there is no opposite to ``n'', but / and ? are
> >symetrical operations using the same ``last argument''. n keeps the
> >direction of the last search, I suppose that might be handy just in
> >case you forgot what way it was you where going... :-).
>
> 'N' is the vertical
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 06:03:19AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> > Speaking of which, are there any plans to actually document vi any time
> > soon? Lots of useful features are missing from the man page!
>
> Sure! Where are your patches for this? I'll review them
> and commit them as soon as
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 06:03:19AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> > > Speaking of which, are there any plans to actually document vi any time
> > > soon? Lots of useful features are missing from the man page!
> >
> > Sure! Where are your patches for this? I'll review them
> > and commit them
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 06:41:07AM -0500, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> True, but it would be nice if the man page was extended to
> include some more documentation. Remember, a lot of our users are
> lazy and if "man x" doesn't give them what they want, then
> they don't go looking elsewhere. Sad
Ooops... stick foot in mouth put on flame proof suit
Mike, you can call me stupid if you want because I was in sending that
email. Thats what happens when you reply to mail without reading the
thread first! Stupid me especially when the subject is clearly about
"make release".
Now b
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:58:01 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> # The first command will fail on a handful of files that have their schg
> # flags set. But it greatly speeds up the next two commands.
> -rm -rf ${CHROOTDIR}
> -chflags -R noschg ${CHROOTDIR}/.
> -rm -rf ${C
> I think that the originator's request is valid, especially since
> some of the original BSD documentation in /usr/share/doc/* has
> rotted since it was originally imported. We have been maintaining
> those documents more as a "historical" perspective than as
> accurate documentation on the curr
Hi folks,
Please be aware that some large deltas have been applied to most of the
scripts in src/etc . While the submitter of the changes (Doug Barton),
David O'Brien, some others and I have done our best to test these
changes, there may be problems.
The changes were discussed on the freebsd-ha
Hi
Inside ed_probe_HP_pclanp() we are doing various checks to see if the device
is there and if we hit a problem we return 0 instead of an error. Attached
is a patch for this problem.
Regards,
Mark Hittinger
Mindspring/Netcom/Dallas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** if_ed.c.1 Mon Sep 13 16:31:29 1999
Sheldon Hearn wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> On Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:58:01 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >
> > # The first command will fail on a handful of files that have their schg
> > # flags set. But it greatly speeds up the next two commands.
> > -rm -rf ${CHROOTDIR}
> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Polstra writes:
: My personal interest is to allow a CVSup master server to avoid
: doing a tree walk whenever a client connects. I want to provide the
: functionality of the old "supscan" utility, but in real time.
Also useful for tasty /dev/ persistance in a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Rodney W. Grimes" writes:
: The rest of us aren't so willing to ``adopt `n'''. Please fix it.
These are the sorts of changes that I was talking about when I was
saying don't mess with the behavior of more too much...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Luke writes:
: I agree I didn't even know there was an "n"
As a emacs fanatic, I find the following message ironic.
In vi since as long as I recall (4.2 BSD?) one can search for the next
occurance of a string with / or with n. more emulates this. I
see no
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please be aware that some large deltas have been applied to most of the
> scripts in src/etc .
Thanks to Sheldon for helping with this, and committing the
results. I'll be watching the lists closely for any reported errors. If
yo
As of 4.0-CURRENT about a few hours ago the ATA-driver screws up with my
secondary master IDE drive ... wd1s1e gets mounted perfectly ... all other
wd1s1 entries fail:
uname -a:
=
FreeBSD shadowmere.student.utwente.nl 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #7:
Mon Sep 13 21:43:49 CEST 1999
[EMA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l>, Pascal Hofstee writes:
>As of 4.0-CURRENT about a few hours ago the ATA-driver screws up with my
>secondary master IDE drive ... wd1s1e gets mounted perfectly ... all other
>wd1s1 entries fail:
Make sure you have rev 1.6 of sys/kern/subr_disk.c
--
Poul-Henning K
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are there any standard APIs for doing file meta-operations
> asynchronously? (open, close, creat, link, unlink, etc.)
I only know of one way to do that. Hand the operation off to a
separate process, using the FD-passing
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> l>, Pascal Hofstee writes:
> >As of 4.0-CURRENT about a few hours ago the ATA-driver screws up with my
> >secondary master IDE drive ... wd1s1e gets mounted perfectly ... all other
> >wd1s1 entries fail:
>
> Make sur
First off its nice you know each other.
Second, I will respond as I see fit to any public posting
with or without your permission Mr. Mike Smith. And yes,
posting messages like that in a public forum is lame because
postings like that get arguments like this started.
Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> The
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:43:11 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Makefile.inc1 .
>
> /usr/src/release/Makefile (This thread is about "make release",
> or did I misunderstand the subject line?)
Haha! Thanks! No wonder I haven't been understanding this thread. :-)
*blush*
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Un
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 05:32:41PM -0400, Mark S. Reichman wrote:
> Second, I will respond as I see fit to any public posting
> with or without your permission Mr. Mike Smith.
HUH?? Where did Mike direct something at you in this thread?
> And yes, posting messages like that in a public forum is
25 matches
Mail list logo