On 10/10/2014 04:27, Steve Wills wrote:
> Dying drives
> shouldn't cause panic, right?
There can be different shades of dying. Returning errors is one thing, hanging
is a different thing. There is a good reason why systems panics in that case.
I am surprised though that the hang was not detected
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:35:14AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Wills"
> To: "Andriy Gapon"
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:27 AM
> Subject: Re: zfs hang
>
>
> > On Wed, Oct 08,
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Wills"
To: "Andriy Gapon"
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: zfs hang
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:55:26AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 08/10/2014 03:40, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:55:26AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 03:40, Steve Wills wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure which thread this belongs to, but I have a zfs hang on one of my
> > boxes
> > running r272152. Running procstat -kka looks like:
>
On 08/10/2014 03:40, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure which thread this belongs to, but I have a zfs hang on one of my
> boxes
> running r272152. Running procstat -kka looks like:
>
> http://pastebin.com/szZZP8Tf
>
> My zpool commands seem to be hung in spa_e
Hi,
Not sure which thread this belongs to, but I have a zfs hang on one of my boxes
running r272152. Running procstat -kka looks like:
http://pastebin.com/szZZP8Tf
My zpool commands seem to be hung in spa_errlog_lock while others are hung in
zfs_lookup. Suggestions?
Thanks,
Steve
