On Tuesday 26 July 2011 08:00 am, Ben Ellis wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim >>
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox i
On Monday 27 June 2011 03:42 pm, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:40:31 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:40:31 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
>> >
>>
On Saturday 25 June 2011 10:28 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> >
> > wrote:
> >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
On 06/27/11 02:49, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:54:08 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
On Fri, Jun
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:54:08 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
> Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk K
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:28:41 +0200
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> > wrote:
> >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:11:27 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> wrote:
>> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>> >
>> > I am rebuilding world/kernel now. �After that, I'll rebuild
>> >
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> wrote:
>> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>> >
>> > I am rebuilding world/kernel now. After that, I'll rebuild
>> > v
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim
wrote:
> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
> >
> > I am rebuilding world/kernel now. �After that, I'll rebuild
> > virtualbox-ose and try to fix it unless someone beat me to it.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
>> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ?
>
> I am rebuilding world/kernel now. After that, I'll rebuild
> virtualbox-ose and try to fix it unless someone beat me to it. :-)
>
> Jung-uk Kim
>
Brilliant !!!
--
George Kontostanos
aisecu
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:40 pm, George Kontostanos wrote:
> > You should be able to build the kmod with this patch.
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-free
> >bsd-mp-r0drv-freebsd.c
> >
> > Just drop this patch in ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/files
> > and
>
> You should be able to build the kmod with this patch.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-freebsd-mp-r0drv-freebsd.c
>
> Just drop this patch in ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/files and
> rebuild.
>
> Please note the revision wasn't set right for the obvious re
On 06/24/11 10:52, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2011 01:14 pm, Matt wrote:
It fails a couple ways actually, first on an isDVD in a disk system
request...commenting out the inq_(something, not in front of
machine with recent svn) parts of that code yields virtualbox
compiling, but failing
On Friday 24 June 2011 01:14 pm, Matt wrote:
> It fails a couple ways actually, first on an isDVD in a disk system
> request...commenting out the inq_(something, not in front of
> machine with recent svn) parts of that code yields virtualbox
> compiling, but failing during kmod compile due to the r
On 06/24/11 09:41, George Kontostanos wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to compile virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 but it fails with
/out/freebsd.amd64/debug -DVBOX -DVBOX_WITH_DEBUGGER -DVBOX_OSE
-DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING
-DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox-ose\"
-DRTP
Hi everyone,
I am trying to compile virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 but it fails with
/out/freebsd.amd64/debug -DVBOX -DVBOX_WITH_DEBUGGER -DVBOX_OSE
-DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING
-DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox-ose\"
-DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE_ARCH=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbo
18 matches
Mail list logo