On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:04:11AM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > > That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes
> > > > > in it.
> > > >
> > > > If there's a be
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes
> > > > in it.
> > >
> > > If there's a better place, then we should move it. We could put it in
> > > , but I don't wan
Neither is devinfo.h. The attached patch should fix it.
- alex
--- devinfo.h.orig Wed Nov 6 13:03:22 2002
+++ devinfo.h Wed Nov 6 13:04:37 2002
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
* $FreeBSD: src/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo.h,v 1.4 2002/09/20 02:16:33 imp Exp $
*/
+#ifndef _DEVINFO_H
+#define _DEVIN
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
[snip]
> > > That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes
> > > in it.
> >
> > If there's a better place, then we should move it. We could put it in
> > , but I don't want to make that header a requirement if
* De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ]
> > If there's a better place, then we should move it. We could put it in
> > , but I don't want to make that header a requirement if one
> > only uses
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:17:24AM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > * De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ]
> > > [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ]
> > > > Maxime He
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:17:24AM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Juli Mallett wrote:
> > * De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ]
> > [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ]
> > > Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > > > Patrick Hartling wr
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:04:19AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > >
> > > This should be fixed with the attached patch. Marcel, can you review
> > > and commit it please ?
>
> Oops, I probably should have pinged Marcel about this, now that I think
> about it, but anyway, it shouldn't change anyt
Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ]
> > Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > > Patrick Hartling wrote:
> > > > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions
* De: Maxime Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ]
> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Patrick Hartling wrote:
> > > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some
> > > C++ code, but l
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Patrick Hartling wrote:
> > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some
> > C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h
> > are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy
> > enough for me to fix my
Patrick Hartling wrote:
> I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some
> C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h
> are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy
> enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this s
Patrick Hartling wrote:
I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some
C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h
are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy
enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this same thi
I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some
C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h
are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy
enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this same thing could
trip up other p
14 matches
Mail list logo
