On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
> >
> > >So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there
> > >another way to have the symlinks be created with the different
> >
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there
> another way to have the symlinks be created with the different
> permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to them)?
We used usermounts with devfs in our last TrustedBSD dem
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>
> >So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there
> >another way to have the symlinks be created with the different
> >permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> [maxim@miss maxim]$ ls -ld /cdrom
> drwxr-xr-x 2 maxim wheel 512 13 ÓÅÎ 2001 /cdrom
[larse@nik: ~] ls -ld /cdrom
drwxrwxr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 27 03:26 /cdrom
Ah, that's the difference. My mountpoint is owned by root. It works if I
create one owned by larse and
On 21:08+0400, Oct 3, 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
> >
> >
> >>[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c
> >>[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0
> >>ln: /dev/acd0: File exists
> >>
> >>Which is really a stra
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there
>another way to have the symlinks be created with the different
>permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to them)?
Symlinks permissions are not used in FreeBSD,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>
>
>>[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c
>>[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0
>>ln: /dev/acd0: File exists
>>
>>Which is really a strange error, since /dev/acd0c is gone:
>
>
> Nothing which the k
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes:
>[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c
>[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0
>ln: /dev/acd0: File exists
>
>Which is really a strange error, since /dev/acd0c is gone:
Nothing which the kernel has created in /dev/ is really gone
wh
Hi,
I'm trying to get all users in wheel to be able to mount floppied and
CD-ROMs. I've set vfs.usermount=1, and found the devfs man page to add a
rule (devfs rule add path acd0\* mode 664 group wheel).
Now, the device entries look like:
[root@nik: /etc] ll /dev/acd0*
crw-rw-r-- 1 root whee
