On 12/31/12 00:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> .. not that I mind old things being retired, but we really should
>> announce things like this.
>>
>> Also - you disconnected libftpio too; is that intentional?
> I would assume so, given that this onl
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> This is what exp- runs are for (portmgr can help with this).
OTOH -exp runs are currently off the air.
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. not that I mind old things being retired, but we really should
> announce things like this.
>
> Also - you disconnected libftpio too; is that intentional?
I would assume so, given that this only removed the static library
name, which nothi
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. not that I mind old things being retired, but we really should
> announce things like this.
>
> Also - you disconnected libftpio too; is that intentional?
>
> Just because libdisk/libftpio isn't used by anything in the base -HEAD
> doesn't
.. not that I mind old things being retired, but we really should
announce things like this.
Also - you disconnected libftpio too; is that intentional?
Just because libdisk/libftpio isn't used by anything in the base -HEAD
doesn't mean that:
* it's not used by third party programs in ports;
* it
