Kris Kennaway writes:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> > (as of a couple of days ago).
>
> Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 -> openssh-1.2.3 -> freefall, and
> it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> (as of a couple of days ago).
Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 -> openssh-1.2.3 -> freefall, and
it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2.26..let me know what
happens aft
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> This only happens when going from machine A -> machine B -> freefall.
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> (as of a couple of days ago).
Hmm. It works for me going 5.0-C -> 5.0-C -> freefall using
openssh both times. P
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
I presume the public key at freefall matches the public key
at machine-B. Try connecting back in the other direction
so that the 'known machines' settings are tested.
>
> This only happens when going from machine A -> machine B -> freefall.
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine
Mike Pritchard writes:
> > Kris Kennaway writes:
> > > > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits
>vs. announced 1024.
> > > > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > > > Warning: identity keysize mi
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> > > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits
>vs. announced 1024.
> > > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > >
Kris Kennaway writes:
> > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 1024.
> > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual 1023, announced 1024
> > A
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 1024.
> Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual 1023, announced
Archie Cobbs writes:
> When I ssh from a 4.0-stable machine, everything works as before.
^^
Oops- sorry, that should be a "3.4-RELEASE" machine.
-Archie
___
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communicati
Harold Gutch writes:
> > Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
> > no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
> >
> > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 10
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:58:42PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
> no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
>
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size
Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
announced 1024.
Warning: This may be due to an old i
12 matches
Mail list logo
