>
> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:31:38 GMT, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
>
> > As of right now, which would that be? The august CD snapshot release or
> > the one available on the cvs servers right now?
>
> If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the
> corner (January some
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes:
: If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the
: corner (January some time). Otherwise, just inhale and prepare to
: bleed. :-)
I think that the January some time date may be optimistic given that
we're not in featur
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> I read that the VM system has been revamped and egcs is the default
> compiler. Will either of these affect the average user besides larger
> binaries?
Actually, egcs WAS the default compiler. It is now (output of gcc -v):
$ gcc -v
Using builti
I read that the VM system has been revamped and egcs is the default
compiler. Will either of these affect the average user besides larger
binaries?
Also, i'm wondering if maybe i should just wait until the 4.1 release for
everything to settle down...
-=> jm <=-
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:31:38 GMT, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> As of right now, which would that be? The august CD snapshot release or
> the one available on the cvs servers right now?
If I were you, I'd hold out for 4.0-RELEASE, since it's just around the
corner (January some time). Otherwis
Some time ago, Greg wrote:
"USers looking for stability should be damn careful which version of the
-current snapshot they run."
As of right now, which would that be? The august CD snapshot release or
the one available on the cvs servers right now?
-=> jm <=-
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
