Re: sem.ko and vfs_aio.ko modules not built by default

2003-03-23 Thread Alfred Perlstein
I removed sem because people were nearly hostile about it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: sem.ko and vfs_aio.ko modules not built by default

2003-03-23 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 11:14:28AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > Sometimes, kernel modules will not be built by default because they are > unstable or experimental features that have not been adequately deployed > or tested. I know our AIO implementation has improved in quality a great > deal over

Re: sem.ko and vfs_aio.ko modules not built by default

2003-03-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > I notice that with a recent -current, that the vfs_aio.ko and sem.ko > modules do not seem to be built by default. In the past, this was not > the case. > > Is it mandatory now to specify the kernel options: > options VFS_AIO > option

sem.ko and vfs_aio.ko modules not built by default

2003-03-23 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I notice that with a recent -current, that the vfs_aio.ko and sem.ko modules do not seem to be built by default. In the past, this was not the case. Is it mandatory now to specify the kernel options: options VFS_AIO options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES in order for these modules to be