On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > 3/ would 64 bits be enough? We are getting both bigger and faster
> > 64000 times faster and 64000 times bigger and we are back at seven
> > seconds. 640 times faster and 640 times bigger and we are stil
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In the resource usage we have teh following values calculated..
>
> longru_ixrss; /* integral shared memory size */
> longru_idrss; /* integral unshared data " */
> longru_isrss;
At 2:48 PM -0800 2/16/03, Julian Elischer wrote:
I think I could make a case for these figures being extended
to 64 bits but:
1/ is it worth it? what uses them? Easier to drop them.
2/ are these mandated by any standard? would making them
64 bits break anything?
3/ would 64 bits be enough? We
In the resource usage we have teh following values calculated..
longru_ixrss; /* integral shared memory size */
longru_idrss; /* integral unshared data " */
longru_isrss; /* integral unshared stack " */
in statclock
