Re: request for your comments on release documentation

2013-06-27 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Jun 27, 2013, at 7:24 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Mark Felder wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > [...] > >>> 3. Is there missing information which should be in the relnotes? >>> Probably there are some missing items for each release, but this >>> question

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

2013-06-27 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mark Felder wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote: [...] 3. Is there missing information which should be in the relnotes? Probably there are some missing items for each release, but this question is one at some abstraction level. Link to commit log and diff, detailed d

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

2013-06-27 Thread John Nielsen
On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > I would like your comments on release notes for each release. > Although I have been working on editing them for years, the workflow > is still not optimal and sometimes delay of the preparation became an > obstacle for release process. I would

Re: request for your comments on release documentation

2013-06-12 Thread Mark Felder
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote: So, my questions are: 1. What do you think about current granularity of the relnotes items? Too detailed, good, or too rough? Currently, judgment of what is included or not is based on user-visible, new functionality, or perfo

request for your comments on release documentation

2013-06-12 Thread Hiroki Sato
Hi, I would like your comments on release notes for each release. Although I have been working on editing them for years, the workflow is still not optimal and sometimes delay of the preparation became an obstacle for release process. I would like to improve it, but before that I would like