David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:43 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:57:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien
> wrote:
> > If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
> > > libreadline, so we'll just end up
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:57:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
> > libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up
> > with a libreadline on the syste
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
Agreed and known. If the application(s) using libreadline weren't
> already GPL I wouldn't have spoken up.
>
> When I added the libreadline compatibility to libedit, I changed all the
> non-GPL libreadline uses to libedit.
Nope. You
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:41:12PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > > after r228114.
> > > The r
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
> libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up
> with a libreadline on the system anyway.
Then you need to define what base system is.
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
>
> I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
> my system or I don't.
>
What I meant is that this problem is not related to the original quest
Brooks,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> What is the value in doing either?
> >
> > libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2.
> >
> > Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of
> > libedit still doesn't work quite the same as
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > after r228114.
> > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> > 1) just build & li
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> after r228114.
> The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
> OR
> 2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
my system or I don't.
Again, "what problem are you trying to solve"?
> The question is what to do with
>The only "problem" I see is from the ports lots of them relies on base
>libreadline, so we need to first run an exp-run without libreadline, to
>determine the impact and fix the related ports, before we can fully drop
>libreadline.
One of the first port to consider, i think, is rlwrap. Some ti
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> Baptiste,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > > after r228114.
> > >
> > > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline
Baptiste,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > after r228114.
> >
> > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> >
> > 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2) re-i
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> after r228114.
>
> The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
>
> 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
>
> OR
>
> 2) re-import libreadli
Hello!
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build & link gdb with libedit
OR
2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build INTERNALLIB version of
it that is never installed an
15 matches
Mail list logo
