Re: regex(3)

Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Daniel C. Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000709 12:46] wrote: > > I think all bugs with the performance improvements to regex(3) have all > > been solved now. I haven't heard of any problems for over a week about > > the first impr

Re: regex(3)

On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > I think all bugs with the performance improvements to regex(3) have all > been solved now. I haven't heard of any problems for over a week about > the first improvement (Boyer-Moore search), and I have now tested the > code against

Re: regex(3)

* Daniel C. Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000709 12:46] wrote: > I think all bugs with the performance improvements to regex(3) have all > been solved now. I haven't heard of any problems for over a week about > the first improvement (Boyer-Moore search), and I have now teste

regex(3)

I think all bugs with the performance improvements to regex(3) have all been solved now. I haven't heard of any problems for over a week about the first improvement (Boyer-Moore search), and I have now tested the code against the original test suit for Spencer's library. I'd like,

regex(3) is leaking memory

I forgot to free the additional memory allocated by regcomp() at regfree(). So, for now, regex(3) is leaking memory. I'll fix it in a short while (but not immediately, sorry). -- Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROT