Re: recent current panic

2003-11-28 Thread Simon Loader
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 08:49, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: > >> It looks very similar to > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to > >> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip, > >> disc or gif interface right now. > > > just to note: I ran tcpdump

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: > >> It looks very similar to > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to > >> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip, > >> disc or gif interface right now. > > > just to note: I ran tcpdump on tunN

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-28 Thread Yuriy Tsibizov
>> It looks very similar to >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to >> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip, >> disc or gif interface right now. > just to note: I ran tcpdump on tunN (which was a pppoe interface) w/o > problems two days

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-27 Thread Sam Leffler
On Thursday 27 November 2003 06:38 am, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: > > Hi, > > > >i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: > > > > > ># tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & > > >[1] 507 > > >listening on lo0 > > > > > ># telnet localhost > > >Trying ::1... > > > > > >Wed Nov 26

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: Hi, > >i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: > > ># tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & > >[1] 507 > >listening on lo0 > > ># telnet localhost > >Trying ::1... > > >Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003 > >Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 > [] > > It looks very si

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-27 Thread Tim Robbins
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 03:00:35PM +0300, ?? ? ?? wrote: > i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: > > # tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & > [1] 507 > listening on lo0 This is a known bug; silby@ is working to fix "lo" and the rest of the affected network drivers. See PR kern/59576. Here's

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-27 Thread Yuriy Tsibizov
>i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: ># tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & >[1] 507 >listening on lo0 ># telnet localhost >Trying ::1... >Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003 >Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 >db> tr > Debugger(c0898daf,0,c087197f,d629d8dc,100) at Debugger+0x55 > panic(c087197f,c0854d72,c

Re: recent current panic

2003-11-26 Thread Sam Leffler
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 04:00 am, Дейтер Александр Валериевич wrote: > i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: > > # tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & > [1] 507 > listening on lo0 > > # telnet localhost > Trying ::1... > > Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003 > Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 > db> tr >

recent current panic

2003-11-26 Thread Дейтер Александр Валериевич
i got a panic on recent -CURRENT: # tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 & [1] 507 listening on lo0 # telnet localhost Trying ::1... Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003 Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 db> tr Debugger(c0898daf,0,c087197f,d629d8dc,100) at Debugger+0x55 panic(c087197f,c0854d72,c168bd00,c095c

RE: Recent -CURRENT panic (New interrupt code related?); backtrace included

2003-11-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Nov-2003 Xin LI/ÀîöÎ wrote: > Yes I have device apic enabled, and after setting options NO_MIXED_MODE, the > problem persists. However, fortunatelly, the spurious.patch seemed to solved > the problem, and the system has been up for 9 hours without panic'ing as I > described before. > > Do y

RE: Recent -CURRENT panic (New interrupt code related?); backtrace included

2003-11-13 Thread Xin LI/李鑫
well? -Original Message- From: John Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:29 AM To: Xin LI/李鑫 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent -CURRENT panic (New interrupt code related?); backtrace included > Do you have 'device apic' enabled? If so,

Re: recent current panic: ic: bio_offset 0 wrong, should be 16844800

2003-11-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This should be fixed now. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alex Deiter" writes: >Recent i386 CURRENT panic at boot diskless PC: > >Mounting root from nfs: >NFS ROOT: 1.1.1.1:/i386/netboot >Interface fxp0 IP-Address 1.1.1.2 Broadcast 1.1.1.255 >Loading configuration files. >Entropy harvesting:

recent current panic: ic: bio_offset 0 wrong, should be 16844800

2003-11-13 Thread Alex Deiter
Recent i386 CURRENT panic at boot diskless PC: Mounting root from nfs: NFS ROOT: 1.1.1.1:/i386/netboot Interface fxp0 IP-Address 1.1.1.2 Broadcast 1.1.1.255 Loading configuration files. Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point. Starting file system checks: cp: utmp: Read-only fil

RE: Recent -CURRENT panic (New interrupt code related?); backtrace included

2003-11-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Nov-2003 Xin LI/李鑫 wrote: > Hello, > > On recently compiled kernels, I often get panics which seemed to be interrupt > related. Among > other things, almost all of them claims that "Kernel trap 30", which seemd to be > strange. > > The kernel I am currently running, namely, > > FreeBSD

Recent -CURRENT panic (New interrupt code related?); backtrace included

2003-11-11 Thread Xin LI/李鑫
Hello, On recently compiled kernels, I often get panics which seemed to be interrupt related. Among other things, almost all of them claims that "Kernel trap 30", which seemd to be strange. The kernel I am currently running, namely, FreeBSD servers.frontfree.net 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURREN

Re: recent -CURRENT panic: trap: memory address not aligned

2003-10-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:13:17PM +0400, ?? ? ?? wrote: > > I think that's due to a recent commit of ume. It might not yet be fixed. > > I'm sorry, my src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-api-fst.c have a version 1.8. > But last commit ume: > > Fix alignment problem on 64 bit ar

Re: recent -CURRENT panic: trap: memory address not aligned

2003-10-15 Thread ?????? ????????? ??????????
> I think that's due to a recent commit of ume. It might not yet be fixed. I'm sorry, my src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-api-fst.c have a version 1.8. But last commit ume: Fix alignment problem on 64 bit arch. I only tested if it doesn't break anything on i368. Since I have no 64 bit machi

Re: recent -CURRENT panic: trap: memory address not aligned

2003-10-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:04:57PM +0400, ?? ? ?? wrote: > Got folowing panic on Netra T1 sparc64: > > Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec > panic: trap: memory address not aligned > Debugger("panic") > Stopped at Debugger+0x1c: ta %xcc, 1 > db> trace > panic

recent -CURRENT panic: trap: memory address not aligned

2003-10-15 Thread Дейтер Александр Валерьевич
Got folowing panic on Netra T1 sparc64: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec panic: trap: memory address not aligned Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x1c: ta %xcc, 1 db> trace panic() at panic+0xf0 trap() at trap+0x394 -- memory address not aligned sfar=0xc037e7c1 sfsr=0x40