Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:44:44, sem (Sergey Matveychuk) wrote about "problems with sysinstall": SM> The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first SM> slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation SM> system' everyt

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 17:32:29, dwhite (Doug White) wrote about "Re: problems with sysinstall": >> Well, I understand it for slices. But why I can't create new partition >> in exist slice and newfs it? It was OK in -stable. DW> yes, this is a change to -curr

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread Janet Sullivan
Well, I understand it for slices. But why I can't create new partition in exist slice and newfs it? It was OK in -stable. yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. My own safety? I can down the system in a million ways, yet can't do what I actually want? A major reason I got f

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-11-01 Thread David Taylor
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Doug White wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> Doug White wrote: >>> This is normal and for your protection. you can't edit the disk you're >>> running off of. If you are running off of ad1, make sure 1) you're root >>> when you run sysinstall and b) you

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Andy Farkas
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Richard Nyberg wrote: > >Doug White wrote: > > > yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. > > > > I think this change in current is for the worse. I don't see why > > I can't manage slices and partitions from my regular OS, but have > > to boot up

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug White wrote: > I don't know how WinXP's bootblocks are set up, but I have this setup on > Win2k and it works as expected with boot0. They are set up to boot directly from NTFS. An NTFS without a small FAT/FAT16/FAT32 partition for initial load will prevent the boot selector code from booting

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Richard Nyberg wrote: >Doug White wrote: > > yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. > I think this change in current is for the worse. I don't see why I can't manage slices and partitions from my regular OS, but have to boot up a CD to do the job. It's not even safer; I am pe

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Richard Nyberg
At Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:32:29 -0800 (PST), Doug White wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Doug White wrote: > > > This is normal and for your protection. you can't edit the disk you're > > > running off of. If you are running off of ad1, make sure 1) you're root > > > when you run sysinstall and

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Doug White wrote: > > "Missing operating system" comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the > > BIOS. > > Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. It means you were barking up the wrong tree :) > > > Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Darryl Okahata
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. > > This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact > > system up with redhat on the first disk and it works perfectly. > > Grub do not supporting UFS2. S

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Doug White wrote: "Missing operating system" comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the BIOS. Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact system up with

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first > slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation > system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. > Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0

problems with sysinstall

2003-10-28 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=100' and reinstall WinXP on clean disk. When

4.0-RC3 problems with sysinstall!!

2000-03-11 Thread Chris Dillon
I decided to grab the iso of 4.0-RC3 and do some installation testing, since problems have plagued the previous releases and I wanted to do my part to make sure that doesn't happen with 4.0. :-) Initial installation from the ISO went flawlessly. My problems are ocurring while using the post-inst