About the vnconfig/disklabel problem, i don't understand one thing: the
sequence that causes the reboot is the same used to produce the
boot floppy images. How comes that it is still possible to produce
snapshots for -current ? Are they cross-built on an older version
of the system ?
che
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >>Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
> >>dkmodslice() and friends is that they manipulate dev_t entries, but don't
> >>actually initialise them. Since th
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 04:30:57PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
> >dkmodslice() and friends is that they manipulate dev_t entries, but don't
> >actually initialise them. Since the subr_diskslice code takes a dev_t
>
> dkmo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
>>dkmodslice() and friends is that they manipulate dev_t entries, but don't
>>actually initialise them. Since the subr_diskslice code takes a dev_t
>
>dkmodslice() once
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes:
>On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 07:30:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >but I'm still looking for the place
>> >where the dev1 entry is supposed to be initialised.
>>
>> In dkmodslice() (and friends).
>
>Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are
>Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
>dkmodslice() and friends is that they manipulate dev_t entries, but don't
>actually initialise them. Since the subr_diskslice code takes a dev_t
dkmodslice() once just manipulated bits in dev_t scalars. Now that dev_t
i
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 07:30:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >but I'm still looking for the place
> >where the dev1 entry is supposed to be initialised.
>
> In dkmodslice() (and friends).
Hmmm, I know this is your code, but are you sure? 8-). My understanding of
dkmodslice() and friends
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes:
>The problem is that disklabel executes code in subr_diskslice.c which
>does:
>
>dev1 = dkmodslice(dkmodpart(dev, RAW_PART), slice);
>
>The 'dev' structure has s_drv1 set correctly, but the 'dev1' entry
>has s_drv1 NULL. When vnstrategy() is ca
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 04:22:46AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I've found panics are more likely to occur if the command pair is
> > executed in a script vs. from the command line. This may suggest some
> > sort of race is occurring.
>
> no idea... i have always managed to panic
Hi,
> I've found panics are more likely to occur if the command pair is
> executed in a script vs. from the command line. This may suggest some
> sort of race is occurring.
no idea... i have always managed to panic the system even running the
commands from the command line one at a time,
>
> Someone also sent me a report on that, so it's a real problem. I have a
> traceback, but without debugging symbols.
Doh! Sorry about that :) I'll rebuild my kernel later today...
Cheers,
Andrew.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
Luigi,
I've been seeing the same thing for about 6 weeks now :)
I, too can reproduce the panic _at will_. If anyone's interested I've got
a large selection of kernel cores to choose from :) ...
Andrew.
Some comments below ...
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trying to bu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
>> > can someone investigate this ? the code seems to work fine on 3.x
>>
>> Someone also sent me a report on that, so it's a real problem. I have a
>> traceback, but without debugging symbols.
>
>it's so easy to reproduce that i hope the vm/vn
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > can someone investigate this ? the code seems to work fine on 3.x
> >
> > Someone also sent me a report on that, so it's a real problem. I have a
> > traceback, but without debugging symbols.
>
> it's so easy to reproduce that i hope the vm/vn gurus
> > can someone investigate this ? the code seems to work fine on 3.x
>
> Someone also sent me a report on that, so it's a real problem. I have a
> traceback, but without debugging symbols.
it's so easy to reproduce that i hope the vm/vn gurus will not require
too much effort to find the bug.
i
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trying to build picobsd on 19990816snap of -current, i am consistently
> hitting a problem, which is totally reproducible from the command line.
> The following sequence
>
> vnconfig -s labels -c /dev/rvn0 fs.PICOBSD
> disklabel -rw /dev
Hi,
trying to build picobsd on 19990816snap of -current, i am consistently
hitting a problem, which is totally reproducible from the command line.
The following sequence
vnconfig -s labels -c /dev/rvn0 fs.PICOBSD
disklabel -rw /dev/rvn0 fd1440
causes a panic with a page fault accessing
17 matches
Mail list logo
