Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
> >
> > > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind
> > > if I take a stab at it?
> >
> >No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who d
At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
>
> > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind
> > if I take a stab at it?
>
>No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-(
RPI has been running with
Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> I know that the specific mergemaster issues have been addressed, but I
> thought this experience pointed out something subtly astonishing, so I
> figured I'd point it out.
>
> I ran mergemaster, and the perl wrapper started complaining that I
> needed to install perl, so I
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
> Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind if I take a
> stab at it?
No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-(
Cheers,
\Anton.
--
| Anton Berezin| FreeBSD: The power to ser
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > It sounds reasonable, but what's the point of having a wrapper at all
> > then?
>
> One way or the other we need to have /usr/bin/perl exist and be usable.
> Many have perl scripts in ~/b
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> It sounds reasonable, but what's the point of having a wrapper at all
> then?
One way or the other we need to have /usr/bin/perl exist and be usable.
Many have perl scripts in ~/bin that they expect to run on all modern
OS's -- whi
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 09:48:05AM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote:
> The wrapper is there so that there are no suprises to people that
> *expect* perl in the system.
> What would possibly be a good idea is that the wrapper is there, but
> it doesn;t actually redirect to the new perl. Then use.perl is
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, John Hay wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:26:18PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > > I ran "use.perl port", and that gave me a working perl for mergemaster.
> > > Interestingly, "use.perl system" didn't give me back the perl wrapper;
> > > I'm not sure what I got. Sigh.
> >
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:26:18PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > I ran "use.perl port", and that gave me a working perl for mergemaster.
> > Interestingly, "use.perl system" didn't give me back the perl wrapper;
> > I'm not sure what I got. Sigh.
>
> That script predates the removal of perl fr
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:26:18PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I ran "use.perl port", and that gave me a working perl for mergemaster.
> Interestingly, "use.perl system" didn't give me back the perl wrapper;
> I'm not sure what I got. Sigh.
That script predates the removal of perl from the base
I know that the specific mergemaster issues have been addressed, but I
thought this experience pointed out something subtly astonishing, so I
figured I'd point it out.
I ran mergemaster, and the perl wrapper started complaining that I
needed to install perl, so I did "pkg_add -r perl". The port
11 matches
Mail list logo
