Re: perl vs. LOCALBASE, again

2000-07-31 Thread Sheldon Hearn
When discussing things like this, where the problem area has a known maintainer, I think that it's wise to include that maintainer in the discussion. Yes, FreeBSD developers are expected to read their -current mail, but in reality, the high level of noise on this list tends to make people very q

Re: perl vs. LOCALBASE, again

2000-07-31 Thread Anton Berezin
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 08:45:05PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > Basically, the problem is that ports that install Perl modules ignore > LOCALBASE for the perl modules. A little bit of investigation turns up > /usr/libdata/perl/5.6.0/Config.pm, which has "/usr/local" wired > through it as a prefix f

perl vs. LOCALBASE, again

2000-07-30 Thread Mike Meyer
My last grip about this didn't draw any response except for "Yeah, I have that problem to". Is there a better place to discuss problems with the Perl integration with FreeBSD? send-pr doesn't have a "perl" category, or I'd try that. Basically, the problem is that ports that install Perl modules i