on 06/09/2010 15:17 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
>> depending
>> on the desired architectur
on 06/09/2010 20:12 Olivier Smedts said the following:
> Here is mine : no difference before and after the patch :
Thanks!
[snip]
> The only thing I noticed is this, after the patch :
> ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
> ada1: ATA-7 SATA 2.x device
> ada1: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA
2010/9/6 Andriy Gapon :
> on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
>> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
RELENG_8:
>
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
> > RELENG_8:
> >
> > - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10)
> > - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2
on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
>>> Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
>>> RELENG_8:
>>>
>>> - Supermicro X7SBA
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tre
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
> RELENG_8:
>
> - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10)
> - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6)
>
> I'll make sure to provide what the to
on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
>>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
> > either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
> > depending
> > on the desire
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
> on the desired architecture:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff
I see
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> The patch is substantially based on the Junk-uk's patch, but with some changes
I several times mistyped Jung-uk's name, my sincere apologies.
Probably should have used jkim instead :)
Thanks to rdivacky for pointing this out to me.
--
Andriy
on 30/08/2010 12:15 pluknet said the following:
> On 29 August 2010 13:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> [Reposted from stable@; edited]
>>
>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
>> depending
On 29 August 2010 13:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [Reposted from stable@; edited]
>
> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
> on the desired architecture:
> http://people.freebsd.org/
[Reposted from stable@; edited]
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
on the desired architecture:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff
The patch is substantially based
14 matches
Mail list logo