On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:32:56AM -0400, James Quick wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:24 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tobias Roth
> >writes:
> >>would it be possible to add the currently attached vnode (or the
> >>complete path to it) to the o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tobias Roth writes:
>would it be possible to add the currently attached vnode (or the
>complete path to it) to the output of
>
> mdconfig -l -u
>
>that would simplify some things for me.
That is actually somewhat tricky because the file might have been
renamed or
Tobias Roth wrote:
> > You could do the vnode. Doing the path is hard.
>
> the vnode is good enough for me. would someone be so kind to implement
> that?
Depends; what are you going to do, with only the address of a
kernel structure? What's having that going to buy you?
> or will this still c
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:21:36PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Tobias Roth wrote:
> > would it be possible to add the currently attached vnode (or the
> > complete path to it) to the output of
> >
> > mdconfig -l -u
> >
> > that would simplify some things for me.
>
> You could do the vnode.
Tobias Roth wrote:
> would it be possible to add the currently attached vnode (or the
> complete path to it) to the output of
>
> mdconfig -l -u
>
> that would simplify some things for me.
You could do the vnode. Doing the path is hard.
The kernel doesn't really know from paths.
Basically,
would it be possible to add the currently attached vnode (or the
complete path to it) to the output of
mdconfig -l -u
that would simplify some things for me.
thanks, t.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
