Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> For those interested,
>
> http://www.technokratis.com/code/mbuf/mbuf_mtx.patch
Assuming we have a "my processor" index somewhere,
how much work would it take to give each processor a
separate cache of mbufs?
Also, I've often wondered if the 'custer' special code mig
For those interested,
I have a preliminary patch that will add mutex locking in the mbuf
subsystem and get rid of the splimp()s. It also fixes some race
conditions previously existing and in relation to tsleep() (i.e. the wait
routines). The patch is rough and early, but watch the same
