Re: malloc() bug in ld

2000-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Hmm, well it went away after a binutils recompile. So maybe I just still > had the old version or something. *shrug* Yes, I did: > ld -V GNU ld version 2.10-anoncvs-2512 (with BFD 2.10-anoncvs-2512) Supported emulations: elf_i386 > ld -V

Re: malloc() bug in ld

2000-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Since setting my malloc.conf flags to AJ I'm getting spontaneous sig10's > in ld(1) - in fact I can't link anything with those flags set. Can anyone > else confirm? Hmm, well it went away after a binutils recompile. So maybe I just still had the old ve

malloc() bug in ld

2000-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
Since setting my malloc.conf flags to AJ I'm getting spontaneous sig10's in ld(1) - in fact I can't link anything with those flags set. Can anyone else confirm? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: