On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 07:49:19AM -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
> > That's kinda hefty for a small port :) I have it marked as broken for
> > -current until the lib is in compat3x.
>
> Why? Many of us still have libc*.so.3 from when that was the v
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 07:49:19AM -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
> That's kinda hefty for a small port :) I have it marked as broken for
> -current until the lib is in compat3x.
Why? Many of us still have libc*.so.3 from when that was the version in
-CURRENT until a month ago.
--
-- David
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > that it requires libc_r.so.3; unfortunately, compat3x does not contain
> > > this lib. Any chance of having it added to compat3x?
> >
> > Yes. The PR is assigned to me, but David already has it on his TODO
> > list. Compat3x is updated late to mak
> > that it requires libc_r.so.3; unfortunately, compat3x does not contain
> > this lib. Any chance of having it added to compat3x?
>
> Yes. The PR is assigned to me, but David already has it on his TODO
> list. Compat3x is updated late to make sure the latest libraries are in.
Until 3.4-REL (w
"Chris D. Faulhaber" wrote:
>
> I am in the midst of updating one of my ports, net/elsa, and have found
> that it requires libc_r.so.3; unfortunately, compat3x does not contain
> this lib. Any chance of having it added to compat3x?
Yes. The PR is assigned to me, but David already has it on his
I am in the midst of updating one of my ports, net/elsa, and have found
that it requires libc_r.so.3; unfortunately, compat3x does not contain
this lib. Any chance of having it added to compat3x?
-
Chris D. Faulhaber | You can ISO9001 certify the process of
System/Network Adm
