On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:17:34AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> I spent some time trying to figure out if there was any reason for this
> and didn't come up with anything. Does the patch below look ok? It just
> adds a couple of macros to set both the native and 32-bit compat
> variable. It works
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:39:35PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:12:31PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:54:49PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > > > 127276 suggests run
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:12:31PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:54:49PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > > 127276 suggests running the binary as is (which I don't like) and
> > > > achieves this with a h
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:54:49PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > 127276 suggests running the binary as is (which I don't like) and
> > > achieves this with a hacky way. So if we really want to do this, the
> > > patch should be re
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:36:14 am Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/30/13 4:54 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >>> 127276 suggests running the binary as is (which I don't like) and
> >>> achieves this with a hacky way. So if we really w
On 7/30/13 5:37 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 29 Jul 2013, at 21:54, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
Well, there was linux_kdump in ports but it apparently got obsolete as
necessary support for included in our regular kdump.
So it may make sense to teach our ldd how to deal with Linux binaries
for consis
On 7/30/13 4:54 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
127276 suggests running the binary as is (which I don't like) and
achieves this with a hacky way. So if we really want to do this, the
patch should be reworked to detect Linux binaries properl
On 29 Jul 2013, at 21:54, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Well, there was linux_kdump in ports but it apparently got obsolete as
> necessary support for included in our regular kdump.
>
> So it may make sense to teach our ldd how to deal with Linux binaries
> for consistency, but its unclear for me if th
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > 127276 suggests running the binary as is (which I don't like) and
> > achieves this with a hacky way. So if we really want to do this, the
> > patch should be reworked to detect Linux binaries properly.
> >
> > In general we should
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:12:54AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:33:53AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On 7/29/13 4:49 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:31:10PM +0400, Gennady Proskurin wrote:
> > >>Hello.
> > >>When linux binary is passed to Fr
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:33:53AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/29/13 4:49 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:31:10PM +0400, Gennady Proskurin wrote:
> >>Hello.
> >>When linux binary is passed to FreeBSD's ldd as argument, this binary is
> >>executed.
> >>I'm sure this
On 7/29/13 4:49 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:31:10PM +0400, Gennady Proskurin wrote:
Hello.
When linux binary is passed to FreeBSD's ldd as argument, this binary is
executed.
I'm sure this is bug :)
(with security involved)
I have a patch for this, but never got around
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:31:10PM +0400, Gennady Proskurin wrote:
> Hello.
> When linux binary is passed to FreeBSD's ldd as argument, this binary is
> executed.
> I'm sure this is bug :)
> (with security involved)
>
I have a patch for this, but never got around to commit it.
http://people.fre
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:31:10 +0400
Gennady Proskurin wrote:
> Hello.
> When linux binary is passed to FreeBSD's ldd as argument, this binary
> is executed. I'm sure this is bug :)
> (with security involved)
>
> % uname -a
> FreeBSD gpr.nnz-home.ru 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> r253701+0
Hello.
When linux binary is passed to FreeBSD's ldd as argument, this binary is
executed.
I'm sure this is bug :)
(with security involved)
% uname -a
FreeBSD gpr.nnz-home.ru 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r253701+0a032f5:
Sun Jul 28 07:43:10 MSK 2013
g...@gpr.nnz-home.ru:/usr/obj/usr/
15 matches
Mail list logo
