Re: FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-20 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Hermit Hacker writes: : : that did her, thanks ... should this maybe be mentioned in : /usr/src/UPDATING? I've gotten into the habit of pretty much checking : there first, and saw no mention of this (could be blind too, its happened : before) ... The new hint

Re: FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread The Hermit Hacker
that did her, thanks ... should this maybe be mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATING? I've gotten into the habit of pretty much checking there first, and saw no mention of this (could be blind too, its happened before) ... On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > Yes, this is what I initiall

Re: FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
Yes, this is what I initially got. Although I'm not quite interested in this particular problem. What I need is profiling to work. Still, what you should look at is adding the `hints' directive to your kernel configuration file, if you haven't done so already. See if that fixes your pr

Re: FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Ya know, I never thought about checkign /var/log/messages on mine to see if it was, in fact, booting (I thought it was, it sounded like it was, but I couldn't think of a way to check) ... Using kernel sources up-to-date as of a few hours ago, I've tried to pare my optimzatins down to a simple '-

FOLLOWING config changes? : Kernel profiling support

2000-06-18 Thread Bosko Milekic
I've recently cleaned up and updated my sources, saving some changes I made elsewhere. I performed a buildworld, installworld, etc. yesterday night with no problems. When I rebuilt my kernel, after having collected the appropriate hints for the system and modified my kernel configurati

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Do > ug Rabson writes: > > >> You can enable kernel profiling by configure kernel with `-p' or '-pp' > >> option. See config(8) and kgmon(8) for detail. > >>

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On 26 Jun 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Another excellent alternative for kernel profiling is iprobe. > > Can we get a pointer? There is a nice tutorial at http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/iprobe.html. This tool is alpha specific th

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Do ug Rabson writes: >> You can enable kernel profiling by configure kernel with `-p' or '-pp' >> option. See config(8) and kgmon(8) for detail. >> >> I have a patch for FreeBSD/alpha to support kernel profiling

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another excellent alternative for kernel profiling is iprobe. Can we get a pointer? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
mode? > > Has anyone attempted to write this? > > You can enable kernel profiling by configure kernel with `-p' or '-pp' > option. See config(8) and kgmon(8) for detail. > > I have a patch for FreeBSD/alpha to support kernel profiling. Another exc

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
At Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:11:43 +0200, Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just curious: would it be easily doable to profile the kernel by > sampling the program counter, la profil(2) but for kernel mode? > Has anyone attempted to write this? You can enable kernel prof

kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Pierre Beyssac
Just curious: would it be easily doable to profile the kernel by sampling the program counter, à la profil(2) but for kernel mode? Has anyone attempted to write this? -- Pierre Beyssac[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] {Free,Net,Open}BSD, Linux : il y a moins bien, mais c'est plus cher