On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:32:43 -0400 Mark Johnston
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 05:29:34PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:24:58 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
I use devel/llvm* to build base
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 05:29:34PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:24:58 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >> I use devel/llvm* to build base and just switched to llvm12. It seems
> >> that on i386 clang12
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:24:58 +0300 Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> I use devel/llvm* to build base and just switched to llvm12. It seems
>> that on i386 clang12 uses R_386_PLT32 relocations for some calls to at
>> least memset, memcpy
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use devel/llvm* to build base and just switched to llvm12. It seems
> that on i386 clang12 uses R_386_PLT32 relocations for some calls to at
> least memset, memcpy and __stack_chk_fail (clang11 uses R_386_PC32).
> These ar
Hi,
I use devel/llvm* to build base and just switched to llvm12. It seems
that on i386 clang12 uses R_386_PLT32 relocations for some calls to at
least memset, memcpy and __stack_chk_fail (clang11 uses R_386_PC32).
These are converted to R_386_JMP_SLOT relocations by the linker which
aren't suppor
