Re: i386/boot2.c patches

2002-03-21 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Mar-2002 Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2002-03-20, John Baldwin écrivait : > >> Looks mostly ok to me. Not entirely sure about the autoboot changes >> as it looks weird to load(kname) right before you change what kname >> is. I think the logic must somehow be wrong there. > > But this is wh

Re: i386/boot2.c patches

2002-03-20 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2002-03-20, John Baldwin écrivait : > Looks mostly ok to me. Not entirely sure about the autoboot changes > as it looks weird to load(kname) right before you change what kname > is. I think the logic must somehow be wrong there. But this is what is currently in the code (as I mentioned in t

RE: i386/boot2.c patches

2002-03-20 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Mar-2002 Pierre Beyssac wrote: > Would anyone mind if I commit the following to i386/boot2.c? > I've reviewed and tested them. > > add -n option to boot2 to disallow user interruption > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36016 Looks fine to me. > boot2 cleanup (modulo style

i386/boot2.c patches

2002-03-20 Thread Pierre Beyssac
Would anyone mind if I commit the following to i386/boot2.c? I've reviewed and tested them. add -n option to boot2 to disallow user interruption http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36016 boot2 cleanup (modulo style(9) and a minor typo in a comment): http://www.FreeBSD.org/