Re: hd numbering in 9.0beta1

2011-08-29 Thread Edho P Arief
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Roger Genre wrote: > But adding a new hard disk will shift one, more, or all the previous > numbers, (depĂȘnding from the channel the new disk is attached to), making > the /etc/fstab files irrelevant, and leading kernel in panic at boot-up. > there's a good reason

Re: hd numbering in 9.0beta1

2011-08-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Roger Genre wrote: Hi everybody, I would point out a problem related with the new way, coming in 9.0, to hard disks numbering. As far I remember (5.0 ?), hardware detection of H.D.'s at O.S. boot-up numbered every channel potentially able to attach a disk to, and tagge

Re: hd numbering in 9.0beta1

2011-08-29 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 29/08/2011 10:10 Roger Genre said the following: > Perhaps I miss some important new feature introduced in 9.0 to work around > that > problem ? Most likely you just overlook a CAM feature that you have not needed before. Please see cam(4), search for 'wired'. -- Andriy Gapon ___

hd numbering in 9.0beta1

2011-08-29 Thread Roger Genre
Hi everybody, I would point out a problem related with the new way, coming in 9.0, to hard disks numbering. As far I remember (5.0 ?), hardware detection of H.D.'s at O.S. boot-up numbered every channel potentially able to attach a disk to, and tagged the disks really attached with the numb