I tried doing the same on FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE
but when I run it it complains that it is unable to find dynamic linker
breakpoint function and then it stops with a SIGTRAP.
Any ideas what might be wrong?
Thanks.
-Kip
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Richard Cownie wrote:
> I
on 3.2-R gdb-4.18 will core dump without fail when I try to read a core
file generated by the C++ program I am developing - gdb-4.17 does not have
this problem.
-Kip
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Richard Cownie wrote:
>
>
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Richard Cownie wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> > saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
>
> gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (at least for C++). You can't
> call
Richard Cownie wrote:
>
> I managed to build gdb-4.17 in FreeBSD 4.0, here's how to do it:
>
> 1) gdb-4.17/configure --host=i386-unknown-freebsdelf4.0
> Have to specify the host explicitly, otherwise it doesn't realize
> it needs to use ELF.
>
> 2) in gdb-4.17/Makefile, add "-DSVR4_SHAR
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > Did anyone of you took care that you can build an aout gdb on an ELF
> > FreeBSD system?
> >
> > I don't mean a gdb that is aout, but one that can debug aout binaries.
>
> I thought the gdb in our base system could debug aout binaries. Or
> am
> Did anyone of you took care that you can build an aout gdb on an ELF
> FreeBSD system?
>
> I don't mean a gdb that is aout, but one that can debug aout binaries.
I thought the gdb in our base system could debug aout binaries. Or
am I sadly mistaken.
> That would be most useful to have as a p
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Richard Cownie wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> > > saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
> >
> > gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (
Richard Cownie wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> > saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
>
> gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (at least for C++). You can't
> call methods from the gdb c
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
> Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.18 for debugging C++? Or are you
> saying you didn't know FreeBSD comes with gdb:
gdb-4.18 is badly broken on all platforms (at least for C++). You can't
call methods from the gdb command line, and also it frequent
> I managed to build gdb-4.17 in FreeBSD 4.0, here's how to do it:
...
> Then it should all build (and perhaps work). The same hacks probably apply
> to gdb-4.18 and gdb-current (but so far gdb-4.17 is the most useful version
> I've seen for debugging C++).
Are you saying 4.17 is better than 4.1
I managed to build gdb-4.17 in FreeBSD 4.0, here's how to do it:
1) gdb-4.17/configure --host=i386-unknown-freebsdelf4.0
Have to specify the host explicitly, otherwise it doesn't realize
it needs to use ELF.
2) in gdb-4.17/Makefile, add "-DSVR4_SHARED_LIBS" to definition of CFLAGS
3) in
11 matches
Mail list logo
