Re: fixes for gcc -falign-foo

2002-06-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:28:34PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hey Bruce or David... has GCC3 by any chance fixed the stack alignment > eyesore or is that still the default? If so could we by any chance fix > it in our version? It creates massive bloat when you have lots of tiny >

Re: fixes for gcc -falign-foo

2002-06-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hey Bruce or David... has GCC3 by any chance fixed the stack alignment > eyesore or is that still the default? If so could we by any chance fix > it in our version? It creates massive bloat when you have lots of tiny > functions and as

Re: fixes for gcc -falign-foo

2002-06-05 Thread Matthew Dillon
Hey Bruce or David... has GCC3 by any chance fixed the stack alignment eyesore or is that still the default? If so could we by any chance fix it in our version? It creates massive bloat when you have lots of tiny functions and as far as I can tell there is no advantage at all exc

fixes for gcc -falign-foo

2002-06-05 Thread Bruce Evans
I have been using the following fixes for gcc -falign-foo for almost a month with no problem. %%% Index: toplev.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/gcc/toplev.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -2 -r1.13 toplev.c --- toplev.c