n Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Hiroyuki Hanai wrote:
> Setting status flags using F_SETFL command of fcntl(2) on the file
> descriptor, which is returned by open(2)ing /dev/random, seems not to
> be supported. For example, when I run following code;
File flags should be handled at the file level, and mostl
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Hiroyuki Hanai wrote:
>
> Setting status flags using F_SETFL command of fcntl(2) on the file
> descriptor, which is returned by open(2)ing /dev/random, seems not to
> be supported. For example, when I run following code;
>
> [...]
>
> 3.4-RELEASE(and possibly 3.5 and 3.5.1)
> I'm looking at this; I'll have something by the end of the weekend
> for 5-CURRENT; 4-STABLE will take a bit longer. I don't think I'll
Wow, great.
> dop anything for 3-* as it is at its end-of-life.
I agree. We can ignore 3-* as long as they don't show any big
problem.
Cheers,
h.hanai
To
Hi
I'm looking at this; I'll have something by the end of the weekend
for 5-CURRENT; 4-STABLE will take a bit longer. I don't think I'll
dop anything for 3-* as it is at its end-of-life.
Domo Arrigato!
M
>
> Setting status flags using F_SETFL command of fcntl(2) on the file
> descriptor, whic
Setting status flags using F_SETFL command of fcntl(2) on the file
descriptor, which is returned by open(2)ing /dev/random, seems not to
be supported. For example, when I run following code;
#include
#include
#include
main()
{
int fd;
fd = open("/dev/random", O_RDONLY);
