On Sunday 01 December 2002 08:28, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > > [root@tiamat]:/root> mount 10.0.0.11:/storage /mnt/azazel
> > > [root@tiamat]:/root> cd /mnt/azazel
> > > /mnt/azazel: Input/output error.
> >
> > This looks like a totall
On Sunday 01 December 2002 08:28, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > >From a remote host (A FreeBSD STABLE one):
> > >
> > > [root@tiamat]:/root> mount 10.0.0.11:/storage /mnt/azazel
> > > [root@tiamat]:/root> cd /mnt/azazel
> > > /mnt/azazel: Input/output error.
> >
> > This looks like a totally different
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > * Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
> > >
> > > Yes, this one seems to work.
> >
> > Hold on.. now remote hosts _see_ the ext2fs share, but m
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > > Can this be patched by doing some subtitutions in the files that use the
> > > "old" mount syscall? Or is it more hairy than that?
> >
> > Can you try the attached patch and tell me if it works ?
>
> T
Emiel Kollof wrote:
> * Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
> >
> > Yes, this one seems to work.
>
> Hold on.. now remote hosts _see_ the ext2fs share, but mounting will not
> work. Yes it will mount without fail
* Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
>
> Yes, this one seems to work.
Hold on.. now remote hosts _see_ the ext2fs share, but mounting will not
work. Yes it will mount without failing, but accessing won't work.
>F
Emiel Kollof wrote:
> * Maxime Henrion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
>
> Yes, this one seems to work.
I'm also interested in the panic you got with the previous broken patch.
What was the panic message ? Can you get
* Maxime Henrion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
Yes, this one seems to work.
Cheers,
Emiel
--
Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to school.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
* Maxime Henrion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> There were stupid mistakes in this patch. Can you try this one instead ?
*grin* NOW you tell me... geez :)
Well, disregard that previous report then, is was based on your old
patch.
Cheers,
Emiel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
* Maxime Henrion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Can you try the attached patch and tell me if it works ?
Tried it, and no, it doesn't work. Also, when I kill mountd and restart
it, I get a kernel panic. HUPping mountd just gives the same error.
Cheers,
Emiel
--
A diplomat is a man who can convi
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > * Juli Mallett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > > kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> > > > mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Operation not supported
> > >
> > > I have the same problem, more or less, with UFS :( I can
Emiel Kollof wrote:
> * Juli Mallett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> > > mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Operation not supported
> >
> > I have the same problem, more or less, with UFS :( I can no longer set up
> > an NFS server,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> I'm having some odd trouble with exporting a ext2fs with NFS.
> ...
> Seems allright, no? Well, when I invoke or HUP mountd, the following
> happens:
>
> kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Opera
* Juli Mallett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> > mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Operation not supported
>
> I have the same problem, more or less, with UFS :( I can no longer set up
> an NFS server, but only started investigating/do
* Emiel Kollof ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sorry for the reply to self, this needs some clarifying before people
jump to all the wrong conclusions:
> kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Operation not supported
> mountd[344]: bad exports l
* De: Emiel Kollof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-27 ]
[ Subjecte: ext2fs and NFS exporting wackyness ]
> kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old mount syscall
> mountd[344]: could not remount /storage: Operation not supported
> mountd[344]: bad exports list
Hey folks,
I'm having some odd trouble with exporting a ext2fs with NFS.
First of, some info:
uname:
FreeBSD azazel.ipv6.hackerheaven.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1:
Wed Nov 27 19:59:24 CET 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AZAZEL i386
mount_ext2fs.c:
$FreeBSD: src/sbin/mount
17 matches
Mail list logo
