27;t seen any
>> >messages about this, so I figured I'd ask here.
>> >
>> >Message:
>> >Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
>> >non-sleepablelocks held:
>> >Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: exclusive sle
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Derek Tattersall wrote:
> > Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following
> > non-sleepablelocks held:
>
> The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
> transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
>
> John: did you look at my patch for t
Derek Tattersall wrote:
> Mar 10 20:55:09 lorne kernel: malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepablelocks
> held:
The only malloc of 64 bytes in this code path should be the
transient template structure malloc (FWIW).
John: did you look at my patch for the locking?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe
* Jonathan Lemon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030312 01:12]:
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:59:15 -0600 (CST)
> From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: exclusive sleep mutex netisr...
>
) of "64" with the following
>non-sleepablelocks held:
>Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: exclusive sleep mutex netisr lock r = 0
>(0xc0579160) locked @ /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:215
>
>Can anybody supply me a clue as to what's going on here?
It can be ignored for now, t
lloc() of "64" with the following
> non-sleepablelocks held:
> Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: exclusive sleep mutex netisr lock r = 0
> (0xc0579160) locked @ /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:215
>
> Can anybody supply me a clue as to what's going on here?
Problem with Jonathan
elocks held:
Mar 11 17:33:30 lorne kernel: exclusive sleep mutex netisr lock r = 0
(0xc0579160) locked @ /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:215
Can anybody supply me a clue as to what's going on here?
--
Derek Tattersall[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
