Yea thank you guys, I got it to work now.
- Martin
On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:42 AM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM, wen heping wrote:
>> I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month.
>
> There were some intermittent issues but *recent* stable/9 sh
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:27 PM, wen heping wrote:
> I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month.
There were some intermittent issues but *recent* stable/9 should build
fine on *recent* head. If not, please report the errors and have sjg@
look at them.
Thanks,
Hiren
>
> we
I build 9-STABLE on head today, while failed many times last month.
wen
2013/7/16 Brooks Davis
> After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last
> week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new
> current I'd updated to fixed it.
>
> -- Brooks
>
>
After not working for quite some time, I was able to build 9-STABLE last
week. I'm not sure if something changed in the branch or if the new
current I'd updated to fixed it.
-- Brooks
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:07:04PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see exactly the same error on pointyh
Hi,
I see exactly the same error on pointyhat too, did you find any work around for
that?
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:11 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I recently upgraded my main buildbox from an ancient 9.0-STABLE snapshot
> to head and I've run into an issue building 9-STABLE on it. Initally
> this w
I recently upgraded my main buildbox from an ancient 9.0-STABLE snapshot
to head and I've run into an issue building 9-STABLE on it. Initally
this was broken by the switch to bmake, but Simon committed a work
around that and using the fmake port also works around it. Now I'm
seeing a strange erro
