On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:28:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > +if !defined(CPUTYPE)
> > > +CPUTUNE ?= ev56
> > > +.endif
> > > CPUTYPE ?= ev4
> >
> > What is this for?
>
> Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we stron
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@
> > > # presence of a CPU feature.
> > >
> > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH}
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > +if !defined(CPUTYPE)
> > +CPUTUNE ?= ev56
> > +.endif
> > CPUTYPE ?= ev4
>
> What is this for?
Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@
> > # presence of a CPU feature.
> >
> > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
> > -. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
> > -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@
> > # presence of a CPU feature.
> >
> > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
> > -. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
> > -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk?
> I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of
> course).
>
Do we need PPC and Sparc flags?
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@
> # presence of a CPU feature.
>
> .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
> -. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
> -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386
> +. if ${CPUTYPE} == "athlon"
> +MACHINE_CPU = athlon 3dnow mmx
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> [bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
>
> What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk?
> I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of
> course).
>
>
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk?
I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of
course).
Index: bsd.cpu.mk
===
