w do I do this without needing a reinstall?
> > >
> >
> > I did this several times from sources. Be aware of one problem which
> > could be fatal. If you created a encrypted partition with GELI and
> > you downgrade, the older version might not be able to h
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 04:35:35PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Garrett Cooper, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> V7 support was never MFCed to stable/9. It’s in stable/10 and newer
> and was included in 10.0-RELEASE:
Right, but it's not listed in 10.0's (or stable/10's) geli.8; _that_
rev was never MFC'd
On May 31, 2015, at 16:27, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 04:20:42PM -0700 I heard the voice of
> Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> Unfortunately the list ends at 9.0. It would be nice if it could be
>> updated. I might sift through SVN and see if I can put together
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 04:20:42PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Unfortunately the list ends at 9.0. It would be nice if it could be
> updated. I might sift through SVN and see if I can put together a patch for
> 10.2. It is quite likely that the version has
My desktop machine is 11-current and I want to down grade it to
> > > > 10-stable how do I do this without needing a reinstall?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I did this several times from sources. Be aware of one problem which
> > > could be fatal. If you
w do I do this without needing a reinstall?
> > >
> >
> > I did this several times from sources. Be aware of one problem which
> > could be fatal. If you created a encrypted partition with GELI and you
> > downgrade, the older version might not be able to handle the encryption
&g
es. Be aware of one problem which
> could be fatal. If you created a encrypted partition with GELI and you
> downgrade, the older version might not be able to handle the encryption
> of the newer version. This is not mentioned in the documentation.
The "[h]ighest GELI metadata ver
; I did this several times from sources. Be aware of one problem which
> could be fatal. If you created a encrypted partition with GELI and you
> downgrade, the older version might not be able to handle the encryption
> of the newer version. This is not mentioned in the documentation.
created a encrypted partition with GELI and you
downgrade, the older version might not be able to handle the encryption
of the newer version. This is not mentioned in the documentation.
There might be also a catch with the mix of kernel/world. To avoid
problems there, I ran both the installation of k
On Sat, 30 May 2015 05:52:56 -0400 Aryeh Friedman
wrote
> My desktop machine is 11-current and I want to down grade it to 10-stable
> how do I do this without needing a reinstall?
This article By Warren Block might be of help:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/stable.html
HTH
--Chris
>
2015-05-30 11:52 GMT+02:00 Aryeh Friedman :
> My desktop machine is 11-current and I want to down grade it to 10-stable
> how do I do this without needing a reinstall?
>
> I have done the downgrade of my home server few weeks ago.
I have done this rebuilding the whole OS from source:
My desktop machine is 11-current and I want to down grade it to 10-stable
how do I do this without needing a reinstall?
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hello Claus Assmann and FreeBSD friends,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 07:44:20AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
>
> > > > Note: see README file in case of errors.
> > >
> > > > pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > Note: see README file in case of errors.
> >
> > > pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff -Tascii -me | ul -t dumb > op.txt
> > > ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 133
> You are so right and I had
Hello Claus Assmann,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:32:28AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
>
> > You are right. The following error occurs:
> >
> > Note: see README file in case of errors.
>
> > pic -C op.me | eqn
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
> You are right. The following error occurs:
>
> Note: see README file in case of errors.
> pic -C op.me | eqn -C -Tascii | groff -Tascii -me | ul -t dumb > op.txt
> ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 1
So this is not a way to go!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
> >> Dear FreeBSD friends,
> >>
> >> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Met vriendelijk
iends,
>>
>> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>> With kind regards,
>> Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
>> De jrus wah,
>>
>> Wiel
>>
>> ***
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
Why would you want to do that?
Compiling the source code would be my preferred method...
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Dear FreeBSD friends,
I used portdowngrade, but compiling sendmail 8.14.5 throws an error
message. So this is not a way to go!
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:23:16PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
>
Dear FreeBSD friends,
Is there a way to downgrade sendmail to Version 8.14.5?
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With kind regards,
Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
De jrus wah,
Wiel
*
W.K. Offermans
___
freebsd-current
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:47:13 +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> Wed, May 23, 2001 at 15:43:50, nk (Norbert Koch) wrote about "downgrade":
>
> > Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
>
> A ~month ago I downgraded my home system from -current
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> Current (not -current;)) but "contemporary") world building procedure
> does not exclude headers from /usr/include out of compiler view.
This was broken in src/Makefile.inc1 rev.1.105. /usr/include was still
still needed in rev.1.104 for building
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 15:43:50, nk (Norbert Koch) wrote about "downgrade":
> Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
A ~month ago I downgraded my home system from -current to -stable (RELENG_4)
via buildworld+installworld. But to do it successfully I had to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Norbert Koch writes:
: Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
make installworld
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Norbert Koch writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
>
Yes, it's possible, but if you've got much on your system I don't think
it's worth it. I (almost) did it a couple of months ago. It's not for the
fa
Hi!
Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
Thanks,
norbert.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> > Dear Alfred Perlstein,
> >
> >
> >
> > >From the posts I have been reading, I seem to understand that the
> > following may apply (depending on the divergence/relationship between
> > -CURRENT and -STABLE):
> >
> > -- It may be nec
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Yes you're correct there will be problems with perl, that's
> why you need a 4.x machine to do the building on and that's also
> why you may need several 'make -k installworld' runs to finally
> get a 'make installworld' to work.
How about:
sh -c "
* Salvo Bartolotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001007 12:14] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 10/7/00, 12:13:28 PM, Alfred Perlstein <[EMA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/7/00, 12:13:28 PM, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: downgrade?:
> * Philipp Huber &l
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> and then looking for libraries that are too new.
Would one not want to keep the libraries that are too new for things in
/usr/local that would need them. Since the shlib symlink will be for the
"older" lib, there really isn't any pro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philipp Huber writes:
: is it possible to downgrade a freebsd-current installation to -stable?
: or is it better to reinstall the whole system?
Yes. However, it is tricky and not for the feign of heart. It
involves doing an install world onto the
hi!
is it possible to downgrade a freebsd-current installation to -stable?
or is it better to reinstall the whole system?
thx
Philipp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Philipp Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001007 04:08] wrote:
> hi!
>
> is it possible to downgrade a freebsd-current installation to -stable?
> or is it better to reinstall the whole system?
It's possible by building a 4.x-stable system and tar'ing the
/usr/src and /u
hi!
is it possible to downgrade a freebsd-current installation to -stable?
or is it better to reinstall the whole system?
thx
Philipp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
ny that may have had a
version bump for CURRENT, ie. libfoo.so.1 in STABLE was libfoo.so.2 in
CURRENT. Any ports that you compiled with c++ in CURRENT will have to be
recompiled after you downgrade. Those are the types of issues I think
you will run into. Doing the binary upgrade should prese
OK, this is kinda a crazy questions, but..what the hell
We have a production machiene that runs our internal mail server that I just
inherited sysadmin'ing (the other guy quit). The problem is that it is
currently running 4.0-current. I like current, I run it on my test system at
home, but I
38 matches
Mail list logo
