On 17-Mar-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I have no idea what the frig you guys are doing in vm_map.c. I would
> recommend that all the changes be backed out. Then I would recommend
> that the following be done:
>
> * change the lockmgr vm_map lock to be exclusive-only
> *
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> :
> :Hi,
> :
> :Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
> :solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
> :Just some info. :)
> :
> :Regards,
> :
> : -- Hiten Pandya
> : -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Hmm. Ok, so right now the code that has been branched for DP1 makes use
:of Brian's recent locking commits. My original thought was we'd simply
:back it out of that branch to make sure that the DP is reliable. How hard
:would it be for us to switch to what you propose (just convert all slocks
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> It fixed some things, it broke some things. Pretty much standard
> fare for anyone who has ever done work on the vm_map lock, including
> yours truely. John Dyson couldn't get it right, David Greenman couldn't
> get it right, I could
:
:Hi,
:
:Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
:solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
:Just some info. :)
:
:Regards,
:
: -- Hiten Pandya
: -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It fixed some things, it broke some things. Pretty much st
Hi,
Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
Just some info. :)
Regards,
-- Hiten Pandya
-- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no idea what the
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 19:08:53 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Seigo> Attached patch implements sx_upgrade() which should work as you said
Seigo> above. This compiles fine, but is not tested yet.
The last patch breaks INVARIANTS. This one compiles and seems to work.
sx_upgrad
[Add jhb and move to -current]
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:53:20 -0800,
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Alfred> * Brian F. Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020315 03:22] wrote:
>> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > What is the problem?
>>
>> Damn good question. Are the