In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
: and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Not really. No differences that are important. (eg, different machine
names, snap
Is there any difference between the snapshots built on the japanese site
and the ones that were built on the US one? Thanks
Ken
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> > Why does current.freebsd.org point to the
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:33:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site
> snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to
> install -CURRENT on one of my machines.
Because it's the only reliab
Why does current.freebsd.org point to the japanese snapshot site
snapshots.jp.freebsd.org? I'm just wondering because I am trying to
install -CURRENT on one of my machines.
Ken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
and ask if it's going to start back up again.
>
> They never stopped, `make release' has been broken. Just like
> current.freebsd.org there are "holes" in snapshots. :-P
current.freebsd.org works again now (it's been p
twork bandwidth and PCs (but I don't know I can
> > find or not). Anyway, sorry for inconveniences at this time.
>
> Sounds like actually doing one suggestion Kris had that JKH veto'ed would
> be a good idea. That is having the old current.freebsd.org and
> rele
find or not). Anyway, sorry for inconveniences at this time.
Sounds like actually doing one suggestion Kris had that JKH veto'ed would
be a good idea. That is having the old current.freebsd.org and
releng4.freebsd.org machines mirror snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org. This would
reduce the admin l
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org
> is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work?
ENOCLUE. But does it matter? Either today or w/the CNAME sysinstall is
referenced. The de
pped, `make release' has been broken. Just like
current.freebsd.org there are "holes" in snapshots. :-P
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > > > re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> > > > one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to kno
by
> someone else would help.
Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org
is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work?
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All of this is for nothing if we don't
chuckr> Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21.
Mainly because kern.flp was flood. Any tiny breakages refuse to make
a distribution.
chuckr> Manfred Antar told me about ftp.kddlabs.co.jp, which is the
chuckr> "good" site.
It mirrors snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org daily, if my l
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > is that machine dead?
>
> It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
> releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
> someone else would help.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> is that machine dead?
It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
someone else would help.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:48:47PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > > re-install (having booting probl
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> > re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> > one, easiest fix is just
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
> re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
> one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go for
> a sn
is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go for
a snap of current.
Anyone got one?
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 08:39:41AM -0400, Mike wrote:
Hi,
> I have been trying for several days now to access current.freebsd.org so I
> can get the latest -CURRENT snapshot instead of my usual DP1 -> cvsup ->
> buildworld, but I am unable to get in.. Is this not a public serve
I have been trying for several days now to access current.freebsd.org so I
can get the latest -CURRENT snapshot instead of my usual DP1 -> cvsup ->
buildworld, but I am unable to get in.. Is this not a public server?
saturn# ftp current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
22
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment?
Hmm...
galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp
331 Guest lo
to keep the service mostly "up" for those two days,
> I just want you all to know that I'll feel free to reboot it or take
> it off-line at any time and without notice during that period until
> the service is transitioned. Thanks for your patience.
But this doesn't ment
Hi,
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
load -CURRENT on my laptop.
Any idea?
Cheers,
--
Mig
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I w
m with=20
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost =
an=20
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about t=
o=20
> load -CURRENT on my laptop.
>=20
> Any idea?
>=20
It does seem to be having problems. In the interim, you can
u
- Jordan
>
> > I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> > current.freebsd.org at the moment?
>
> Hmm...
>
> galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
> Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
>
- Jordan
>
> > I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> > current.freebsd.org at the moment?
>
> Hmm...
>
> galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
> Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
>
to keep the service mostly "up" for those two days,
> I just want you all to know that I'll feel free to reboot it or take
> it off-line at any time and without notice during that period until
> the service is transitioned. Thanks for your patience.
But this doesn't ment
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment?
Hmm...
galtvalion % ftp current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
Name (current.freebsd.org:matusita): ftp
331 Guest lo
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I w
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
> current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
> hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow
Hi,
I know this is probably offtopic but is there any problem with
current.freebsd.org at the moment? I've been unable to log in for almost an
hour, the ftp daemon is up, it just doesn't allow me in and I was about to
load -CURRENT on my laptop.
Any idea?
Cheers,
--
Mig
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since some time again I can't get to ftp://current.freebsd.org to
> download current snapshots and packages. Is the machine broken again?
In the meantime you could use ftp://snapshots.jp.freebs
Hello,
since some time again I can't get to ftp://current.freebsd.org to
download current snapshots and packages. Is the machine broken again?
--
Regards,
Georg.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Oct 11 22:17 5.0-20011011-CURRENT
Come 'n get it. No warrantees stated or implied as to how far these
bits get you after you transfer them, of course. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
I did not look at current.FreeBSD.ORG, but at current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
the build on the 1st and 2nd October seem to have succeeded.
I tried to install 5.0-CURRENT-20011002-JPSNAP from current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
then sysinstall says
mknod of /dev/rad0s1b returned failure status!
and stops at the
At Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:54:52 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote:
> current.jp.freebsd.org apparently carries snapshots, although I haven't
> tried it recently.
It's been unable to build a release for the past two weeks since the
release kernel overflows its floppy. The last successful build was
on
login to the current.freebsd.org with the following
> error message:
>
> --- Begin -
> Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Thu Jul 6 03:57:36
> CDT 2000) ready.
> 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as pa
ftp -a fails to login to the current.freebsd.org with the following
error message:
--- Begin -
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Thu Jul 6 03:57:36
CDT 2000) ready.
331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password.
530 Can&#
First we had hardware problems, then NFS was broken on the cluster for
awhile, preventing current.freebsd.org from getting at the CVS
repository. It's fixed now and I see that a snapshot is building
as we speak.
- Jordan
From: Alexey Zelkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: current.freeb
hi,
Is there any reason why 5.0-RELEASE snapshots are not building/uploading
to current.freebsd.org for about 3 months ? Latest i386 snapshot is
20010618.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
wosch> Sorry, my fault.
Never mind :-)
wosch> Nevertheless, current sucks. No successfully builds since 9 days ;-{{
I've checked the original CVS code. It seems that
http://ccvs.cvshome.org/source/browse/ccvs/src/client.c.diff?r1=1.302&r2=1.303>
will fix our problem (sorry I don't test it).
>
> > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST -> 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP
> >
> > The last successfully finished release should be Aug/10/2001.
>
> Right.
>
>
> > Current 5-current release is broken, since KerberosIV-enabled
> > src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs is broken as follows:
>
> Neve
On 2001-08-19 00:48:19 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
>
> wosch> the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated
> wosch> since 3-Aug-2001. What happens?
>
> Really?
Sorry, my fault.
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST -> 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP
>
> T
wosch> the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated
wosch> since 3-Aug-2001. What happens?
Really?
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp 27 Aug 10 17:19 5-LATEST -> 5.0-CURRENT-20010810-JPSNAP
The last successfully finished release should be Aug/10/2001.
Current 5-current release i
Hi Makoto,
the 5.0-current snapshots on current.jp.freebsd.org are not updated
since 3-Aug-2001. What happens?
-Wolfram
>wosch> What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a
>wosch> snapshot anymore?
>
>current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.f
On 2001-08-03 10:27:26 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
>
> wosch> What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a
> wosch> snapshot anymore?
>
> current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back
> again; it's not a *mirror*, but has
No, the machine is dead and we haven't managed to get a replacement
going yet. Hopefully in late August, as soon as everyone involved is
back from vacation.
- Jordan
From: Wolfram Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/sna
wosch> What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a
wosch> snapshot anymore?
current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back
again; it's not a *mirror*, but has almost same features.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA
To Unsubscribe: sen
Hi,
the last -current snapshot is 6 weeks old.
ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20010618-CURRENT/,
What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot
make a snapshot anymore?
-Wolfram
--
Wolfram Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://wolfram.schneider.o
connection refused or timeout
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Thanks, this is my fault too given that I tried to fix it myself
and didn't raise it with you earlier. :(
From: "Mark M. Lutgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org down?] (fwd)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:20:55 -0500 (CDT)
> I was
Yes, it is. I'm trying to get it back online but it needs a hard reset
since it's wedged beyond the point where I can do anything useful
from the serial console.
- Jordan
From: John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: current.freebsd.org down?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:33:52 -
-4770
Qwest Internet Solutions | Voice.(612) 664-3332
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:44:13 -0500
From: Pete McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark Lutgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: current.freebsd.org
is current.freebsd.org down?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
Robert Watson wrote:
> The last package build on current.FreeBSD.org seems to be from March 26th.
> Is there any chance we could get an updated package build for -CURRENT?
AFAIK there are some problems with bento's hardware. Contact Satoshi for more
details.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe
The last package build on current.FreeBSD.org seems to be from March 26th.
Is there any chance we could get an updated package build for -CURRENT?
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
To Unsubscribe
Jordan:
I can probably help you out. 612.664.3078.
Brett
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:56:32 PST, "Jordan Hubbard" wrote:
>> Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but
current.freebsd.org
>> does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both
current.f
> Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org
> does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org
> and usw2.freebsd.org (its alterego) fail. I did find that ftp7.de.freebsd.or
g
> has the 27 November 2000 snapshot of c
Hi All-
Not sure if this the right place to complain or not, but current.freebsd.org
does not appear to be on the net. traceroutes to both current.freebsd.org
and usw2.freebsd.org (its alterego) fail. I did find that ftp7.de.freebsd.org
has the 27 November 2000 snapshot of current on it
matusita> When I backout this change, the problem seems disappeared...
This is sample shell script to reproduce recent kernel hungup:
#!/bin/sh
dd of=/tmp/image if=/dev/zero count=1440 bs=1k
awk 'BEGIN {printf "%c%c", 85, 170}' | \
dd of=/tmp/image obs=1 seek=510 conv=notrunc
vnconfig -s la
jhay> It looks like I spoke too soon. My 2000-10-05 kernel that previously
jhay> worked also now panics. It must be somewhere when the floppies are
jhay> made.
Maybe there is a problem in newfs(8).
peter 2000/10/16 17:41:37 PDT
Modified files:
sbin/newfs mkfs.c
Log:
I
>
> jhay> For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
>
> Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of
> Sep/30/2000 and it panics.
>
> ***
>
> Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000.
> Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000
snapshots are still broken, but you can at least get the previous
ones via ftp now.
- jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
> $ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
>
> How older is your kernel?
> My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release".
Not that old. 2000-10-05. The machine is a dual 266MHz PII. I have
no problem building releases using "NODOC=YES WORLD_FLAGS=-j4" wh
From: John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:07:14 +0200 (SAT)
$ For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
How older is your kernel?
My kernel build 2000-09-21 JST. It panic when "make release"
jhay> For now I just went back to an older kernel that works for me.
Would you please explain "an older kernel" ? I'm using a kernel as of
Sep/30/2000 and it panics.
***
Note that this (Sep/30/2000) kernel doesn't panic until Oct/13/2000.
Between Oct/14/2000 and Oct/17/2000, "make release" was
> $ I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
> $ release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
> $ these two days, when making a boot floppy (the hungup was occured
> $ *exactly* the same point).
>
> I have same experience.My current-box was hun
kana> I have same experience.My current-box was hung up when "make release".
kana> then, log is below:
Ya, exactly the same point of current.jp.FreeBSD.org. The same story
should be applied to current.FreeBSD.org. We cannot make a -current
distribution now. Changes from Oc
From: Makoto MATSUSHITA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org problems?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:30:30 +0900
$ I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
$ release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
$
jkh> I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks.
I'm very interested if current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up when "make
release" procedure was running. current.jp.freebsd.org was hung up in
these two days, when making a boot floppy (the hungup was occured
*exactly* the same point).
-- -
Makoto
I'll look into this tomorrow morning, thanks.
> Bill G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have been trying to download a current snapshot from
> > current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success.
> > The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect&#
Bill G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been trying to download a current snapshot from
> current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success.
> The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am
> doing a standard anonymous ftp, as always. Just wante
I have been trying to download a current snapshot from
current.freebsd.org for the past few days without success.
The error message I receive is 'Login incorrect' - I am
doing a standard anonymous ftp, as always. Just wanted
to make sure someone was aware of the problem, if not
alread
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 10:32:53PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> We've also been forced by the
> silicon valley personnel crunch to hire a new system administrator
> who's a little strange (he refers to himself as "Elvis Preston" and
> makes odd little hip-thrusts at the system rack when he think
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001008 22:36] wrote:
> Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that
> is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with
> this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem.
I don't eve
Behalf Of Jordan Hubbard
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:33 AM
To: Bill Woods mail
Cc: Thomas T. Veldhouse; FreeBSD-Current,
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org
I'm sorry, but BSDi's dead-alien based UPS (as described in that fine
documentary film "repo man") has been unrel
> Well deal with it and get releng4 back up.
That reminds me of a joke: Q. "What do engineers use for birth control?" A. "Their
personalities."
We now return you to our regularly scheduled content-free discussion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
eBSD-Current,
Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org
Please get mailer that doesn't quote the messages you're replying to
in such a brain dead manner.
* Mike Smith wrote:
>
> Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have
> exactly *nothing* to do with its availab
enience, etc etc.
- Jordan
P.S. Unbelievers also claim that both releng4.freebsd.org and current.freebsd.org
are actually at USWest and totally outside the realm of BSDi's control, but
you can't put too much trust in what they say.
> Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice th
I was downloading 1007 this weekend and getting 7-8k a second from
> current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate.
>
> Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not
> agree with them! What is your comment to this...
[snip]
I was downloading 1007 this weekend and getting 7-8k a second from
current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate.
Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not
agree with them! What is your comment to this...
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version
L PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM
> > Subject: current.freebsd.org
> >
> >
> > > whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:13:56PM -0700, Bill Woods mail wrote:
> Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by
> BSDI
The clue boat left the docks and you were standing on the pier. Might I suggest
a long walk...
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH
h
> on hardware these days.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Woods mail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM
> Subject: current.freebsd.org
>
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:18 PM
Subject: current.freebsd.org
> whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of th
whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
FYI, you get the FTP login prompt, but it hangs thereafter. Looks like
something is wedged.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
From: Visigoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Is current.freebsd.org running Linux?
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:32:21 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
visigoth>
visigoth> > current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine.
visigoth> >
visigot
> current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine.
>
> /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
Thanks Hidetoshi, but I think my meager 3 years of nihongo in highschool
are not going to be enough to run a Japanese snapshot just yet...
Damieon Stark
Sr. Unix Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTE
It is down right now. It will be back soon. Thanks for asking
so loudly.
> Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges
> and why won't ANYBODY answer the question?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Tom Veldhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
current.jp.freebsd.org is another stable/current build machine.
/\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa
\/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP public key: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges
> and why won't ANYBODY answer the question?
Because it's been answered about a dozen times already; it's down with
hardware problems, and the people responsible are trying to do something
abo
Why is this machine (current.freebsd.org) always rejecting guest privileges
and why won't ANYBODY answer the question?
Thanks in advance,
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It seems that current.freebsd.org has been not working for a while
now, and I was wondering if there is a better place to get the new
snapshots, as well as install -current. I brief search of the
mail archives tells me nothing ( i may have missed it, searching for
current.freebsd.org on
transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
> >
> > [central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current.freebsd.org
> > Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> > 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST
> 2000) ready.
> > 3
Temporarily down; "engineers are working on the problem." :)
> Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
>
> [central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current.freebsd.org
> Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
> 220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version
Good luck getting an answer. Nobody seems willing to answer this
question. :(
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, James FitzGibbon wrote:
> Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
>
> [central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current
Is this a transient situation, or is current down for maintainance ?
[central-01:james] ~ (2) > ftp -a current.freebsd.org
Connected to usw2.freebsd.org.
220 usw2.freebsd.org FTP server (Version wu-2.6.0(1) Tue Jan 25 00:05:38 CST 2000)
ready.
331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-m
What is going on with that server? It seems to be denying requests more
than accepting them these days.
[9:08am] 5 [~/FreeBSD]:cascade% ncftp3 current.freebsd.org
NcFTP 3.0.0 (March 20, 2000) by Mike Gleason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Copyright (c) 1992-1999 by Mike Gleason.
All rights reserved
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
